Free BHIC-134 Solved Assignment | July 2024 – January 2025 | HISTORY OF INDIA: 1707-1950 | IGNOU

Question Details

Aspect

Details

Programme Title

BACHELOR OF ARTS GENERAL HISTORY PROGRAMME (BAG)

Course Code

BHIC-134

Course Title

HISTORY OF INDIA: 1707-1950

Assignment Code

BHIC-134/ASST/TMA/2024-25

University

Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)

Type

Free IGNOU Solved Assignment 

Language

English

Session

July 2024 – January 2025

Submission Date

31st March for July session, 30th September for January session

BHIC-134 Solved Assignment

Assignment – I
Answer the following in about 500 words each.
1.What was the nature of the Permanent Settlement?Discuss.
2. Discuss the differences between the Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Congress.
Assignment – II
Answer the following questions in about 250 words each.
3. What were the main ideas of the Utilitarians?Discuss.
4. Comment on the economic impact of the British rule.
5. What was the role of the Constituent Assembly in shaping the Indian Constitution?.
Assignment – III
Answer the following questions in about 100 words each.
6. Ryotwari Settlement
  1. State formation in Hyderabad in the 18 th 18 th 18^(“th “)18^{\text {th }}18th century
  2. The Orientalists in India
  3. Communalism
  4. Transfer of Power

Expert Answer

BHIC-134 Solved Assignment

Assignment – I

Question:-01

What was the nature of the Permanent Settlement? Discuss.

Answer:

1. Introduction to the Permanent Settlement
The Permanent Settlement, introduced in 1793 by the British East India Company, was a land revenue system implemented in Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha. Designed by Lord Cornwallis, it aimed to streamline land revenue collection and establish a stable administrative framework. This system was a significant shift from the earlier, more fluid revenue practices and had a profound impact on the agrarian economy of colonial India.
2. Objectives of the Permanent Settlement
The primary objectives of the Permanent Settlement were to create a reliable revenue collection system, provide financial stability to the British administration, and encourage the investment of capital in agriculture. By fixing land revenues permanently, the British hoped to stabilize income and reduce administrative costs associated with frequent revenue revisions. Additionally, it aimed to create a class of landowners who would be invested in maintaining agricultural productivity.
3. Features of the Permanent Settlement
The Permanent Settlement introduced several key features:
  • Fixed Revenue Assessment: Land revenue was fixed permanently at a specific amount, regardless of changes in agricultural productivity or market conditions. This meant that the revenue demand remained constant, regardless of the crops’ yield or price fluctuations.
  • Transfer of Land Rights: Land rights were transferred to zamindars (landlords) who were responsible for paying the fixed revenue to the British government. Zamindars were granted significant control over land administration and revenue collection from peasants.
  • Hereditary Tenure: The zamindars’ rights were hereditary, meaning that land ownership and revenue responsibilities were passed down through generations. This encouraged zamindars to invest in land improvements, as they could expect long-term returns.
4. Impact on Peasants
The Permanent Settlement had several implications for the peasantry:
  • Increased Tax Burden: While the revenue was fixed, agricultural productivity was not. Peasants faced increased pressure as zamindars often imposed higher rents to meet their revenue obligations, leading to economic strain and indebtedness among farmers.
  • Loss of Land Rights: The system marginalized the peasants by giving significant power to zamindars. Many peasants lost their land or faced eviction if they failed to meet rent demands. This resulted in increased landlessness and socio-economic instability among rural communities.
  • Neglect of Land Improvements: Since zamindars were not directly responsible for land cultivation, they had little incentive to invest in land improvements or agricultural productivity. This led to neglect of the land and decline in agricultural yields over time.
5. Economic Consequences
The Permanent Settlement had far-reaching economic consequences:
  • Revenue Stability: The British administration benefited from a stable revenue stream, which helped finance their operations and infrastructure projects. However, the fixed revenue did not account for inflation or changes in agricultural conditions, sometimes leading to revenue shortfalls.
  • Decline in Agriculture: The lack of investment in land improvements and the extraction of high rents contributed to a decline in agricultural productivity. The rigidity of the revenue system did not accommodate fluctuations in agricultural output or market prices, exacerbating economic difficulties for both zamindars and peasants.
  • Increased Rural Poverty: The exploitation of peasants and the neglect of agricultural development contributed to widespread rural poverty. The economic disparity between zamindars and peasants widened, leading to social and economic tensions in the region.
6. Political and Social Impact
The Permanent Settlement also had significant political and social effects:
  • Strengthening of Zamindar Class: The system entrenched the zamindar class as a powerful socio-economic group with substantial control over rural affairs. This class often used their influence to exert political pressure and maintain their privileged status.
  • Resistance and Rebellion: The harsh realities of the Permanent Settlement led to resistance and uprisings among the peasantry. Notable revolts, such as the Indigo Rebellion and various peasant movements, were partly driven by dissatisfaction with the exploitative practices of zamindars under the Permanent Settlement system.
  • Impact on Land Ownership Patterns: The Permanent Settlement reshaped land ownership patterns, consolidating land into the hands of a few zamindars while disempowering the peasantry. This shift had long-term implications for land distribution and rural socio-economic structures.
Conclusion
The Permanent Settlement was a landmark policy in British India, designed to stabilize revenue collection and create a class of landowners invested in maintaining agricultural productivity. While it achieved some of its objectives, such as providing a stable revenue base for the British administration, it also led to significant negative consequences. The system’s rigid structure and focus on fixed revenue collection resulted in economic hardship for peasants, decline in agricultural productivity, and increased rural poverty. The empowerment of the zamindar class and the resultant socio-economic disparities contributed to long-lasting impacts on India’s agrarian society. Understanding the Permanent Settlement provides insight into the complexities of colonial land policies and their enduring effects on rural India.

Question:-02

Discuss the differences between the Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Congress.

Answer:

1. Introduction to the Indian National Congress
The Indian National Congress (INC), founded in 1885, was a pivotal organization in India’s struggle for independence from British rule. Within the INC, there were two distinct factions that emerged over time: the Moderates and the Extremists. These factions had differing ideologies, strategies, and goals, reflecting the diverse approaches to achieving political reform and independence.
2. Ideological Differences
  • Moderates: The Moderates, led by figures such as Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, and William Wedderburn, believed in gradual reform and constitutional methods. They advocated for reforms within the existing British system rather than seeking radical changes. Their approach was characterized by appeals to the British government for incremental changes, emphasizing petitions, resolutions, and negotiations. The Moderates were focused on developing political consciousness among Indians and fostering cooperation with the British authorities to achieve self-governance.
  • Extremists: The Extremists, represented by leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal, were critical of the slow pace of reforms proposed by the Moderates. They favored more radical methods, including mass mobilization and direct action. The Extremists sought immediate and substantial changes, often challenging the colonial government more aggressively. Their ideology was rooted in the belief that only through intense agitation and public pressure could meaningful reforms and independence be achieved.
3. Strategies and Methods
  • Moderates: The Moderates employed a strategy of working within the framework of British colonial rule. They focused on:
    • Petitions and Resolutions: Submitting petitions to the British Parliament and passing resolutions at INC sessions to advocate for reforms.
    • Constitutional Reforms: Seeking constitutional changes through legal and parliamentary channels to improve governance and increase Indian representation.
    • Educational and Social Reforms: Promoting education and social reforms to raise political awareness and prepare Indians for self-governance.
  • Extremists: The Extremists adopted a more confrontational approach, including:
    • Mass Agitation: Organizing public demonstrations, protests, and rallies to mobilize widespread support and exert pressure on the colonial government.
    • Swadeshi Movement: Encouraging the use of indigenous products and boycotting British goods as part of economic resistance to colonial rule.
    • Radical Methods: Utilizing direct action, including strikes and civil disobedience, to challenge British authority and demand immediate reforms.
4. Goals and Objectives
  • Moderates: The primary goal of the Moderates was to achieve gradual political reform and increased self-governance within the British framework. They aimed to:
    • Increase Indian Representation: Enhance Indian representation in legislative bodies and administrative positions.
    • Promote Educational Opportunities: Expand educational opportunities to prepare Indians for roles in governance and administration.
    • Secure Constitutional Reforms: Advocate for incremental constitutional changes to improve the political and social conditions in India.
  • Extremists: The Extremists were focused on more radical objectives, including:
    • Immediate Independence: Seeking full self-rule and independence from British control rather than gradual reforms.
    • Economic Boycott: Promoting economic self-reliance and resisting British economic exploitation through the Swadeshi Movement.
    • Social and Political Awakening: Inspiring a sense of nationalism and political consciousness among the masses to drive the independence movement.
5. Impact on the Indian National Congress
  • Moderates: The Moderates played a significant role in laying the foundation for Indian political activism and constitutional reforms. Their efforts helped establish the INC as a major political force and facilitated the initial dialogue between the Indian leadership and the British government. However, their approach was often criticized for being too accommodating and slow to achieve substantial changes.
  • Extremists: The Extremists significantly impacted the Indian independence movement by introducing more radical methods and mobilizing mass support. Their approach energized the nationalist movement, increased public participation, and challenged British rule more directly. The Extremists’ activities contributed to the growth of a more assertive and nationalist consciousness among Indians.
6. Evolution and Synthesis
The ideological divide between the Moderates and Extremists was eventually reconciled, leading to a more unified approach within the Indian National Congress. The moderate and extremist factions merged their strategies, leading to a broader and more inclusive nationalist movement. The reconciliation process culminated in the emergence of the Gandhian approach, which combined elements of both moderation and extremism with a focus on nonviolent resistance and mass mobilization.
Conclusion
The differences between the Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Congress reflect the diversity of thought and strategy within the Indian independence movement. While the Moderates pursued gradual reforms and constitutional changes, the Extremists advocated for more radical and immediate action. Both factions played crucial roles in shaping the trajectory of the Indian struggle for independence, and their contributions ultimately led to a more comprehensive and effective nationalist movement. The synthesis of their approaches, combined with the Gandhian philosophy of nonviolence, became a powerful force in achieving India’s independence from British rule.

Assignment – II

Question:-03

What were the main ideas of the Utilitarians? Discuss.

Answer:

The Utilitarians, primarily associated with philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, proposed a theory of ethics and governance grounded in the principle of utility. Their central idea was that the best actions and policies are those that maximize overall happiness or utility. Here’s a brief overview of their main ideas:
1. Principle of Utility:
At the heart of Utilitarianism is the Principle of Utility, which asserts that the rightness or wrongness of actions is determined by their consequences. Specifically, actions are considered morally right if they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This principle emphasizes a consequentialist approach to ethics, where the outcomes of actions are the primary criterion for evaluation.
2. Hedonistic Calculus:
Jeremy Bentham introduced the concept of hedonistic calculus, a method to quantify and compare the pleasure and pain produced by different actions. Bentham believed that happiness could be measured and compared using this calculus, which involves evaluating factors like intensity, duration, certainty, and propinquity of pleasure or pain. The idea was to make decisions that would result in the maximum net pleasure.
3. Reform and Legislation:
Utilitarians applied their principles to social and political reform, advocating for changes that would enhance overall welfare. They supported measures like legal and social reforms to improve conditions and promote equality. Bentham, for instance, argued for the reform of laws and institutions based on their utility in promoting public happiness.
4. Rule vs. Act Utilitarianism:
John Stuart Mill, who expanded on Bentham’s ideas, introduced the distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism assesses each action individually based on its outcomes, while rule utilitarianism considers whether following a general rule would lead to greater overall happiness. Mill emphasized the importance of higher pleasures, such as intellectual and moral pleasures, in evaluating utility.
5. Criticisms and Legacy:
While Utilitarianism had a significant influence on ethical theory and public policy, it faced criticism for potentially justifying harmful actions if they result in greater overall happiness. Critics argue that it can overlook individual rights and justice. Despite these criticisms, Utilitarianism remains a foundational theory in ethical and political philosophy, shaping discussions on morality and governance.
In summary, Utilitarians focused on maximizing happiness and utility through their ethical principles and reform-oriented approaches, leaving a lasting impact on moral and political thought.

Question:-04

Comment on the economic impact of the British rule.

Answer:

The British rule in India, spanning from 1858 to 1947, had a profound and multifaceted economic impact. Initially, the British established a colonial economic system primarily designed to benefit Britain, which included the extraction of resources and the establishment of a trade monopoly. This exploitation led to significant economic consequences for India.
One major impact was the deindustrialization of the Indian economy. Prior to British rule, India had a thriving textile industry and other traditional crafts. However, British policies, such as high tariffs on Indian goods and the promotion of British manufactured products, led to the decline of these industries. This created a dependency on British imports and stunted local economic growth.
Additionally, the British imposed heavy taxes on Indian agriculture, leading to widespread economic distress among farmers. The revenue generated was often used to support the British administration and military expenses rather than local development. This exploitation contributed to recurring famines and poverty, undermining the economic stability of rural areas.
The British also developed infrastructure, such as railways and ports, primarily to facilitate the extraction and export of resources, rather than to enhance the local economy. While these developments did contribute to modernization and connectivity, they were primarily aimed at serving British economic interests and did little to address the needs of the local population.
The economic policies of the British led to a significant drain of wealth from India. The wealth generated from Indian resources and labor was largely siphoned off to Britain, leaving the Indian economy underdeveloped and impoverished. The economic disparities created during this period had long-lasting effects on India’s post-independence economic landscape, influencing its development trajectory for decades.
In summary, while British rule introduced some modern infrastructure and administrative reforms, the overall economic impact was detrimental. It led to deindustrialization, economic exploitation, and infrastructure development that primarily served colonial interests, leaving a legacy of economic challenges for independent India.

Question:-05

What was the role of the Constituent Assembly in shaping the Indian Constitution?

Answer:

The Constituent Assembly of India played a crucial role in shaping the Indian Constitution, laying the foundation for the country’s democratic framework. Formed in 1946, the Assembly was tasked with drafting a constitution that would guide the newly independent nation.
The Assembly comprised 299 members, representing diverse regions, communities, and political ideologies. Its primary responsibility was to create a document that would reflect India’s values, aspirations, and unique socio-political context. The Assembly’s deliberations were characterized by rigorous debates, careful consideration of various models, and a commitment to inclusivity and justice.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, was instrumental in framing the Constitution. Under his leadership, the Committee prepared a draft that was both comprehensive and forward-looking. This draft underwent detailed scrutiny and amendments, reflecting the Assembly’s efforts to balance the need for a strong central government with the protection of individual freedoms and states’ rights.
The Constituent Assembly’s work was not limited to drafting; it also involved extensive discussions on fundamental rights, governance structures, and federal principles. The Assembly aimed to create a Constitution that would ensure justice, equality, and democracy while accommodating India’s diversity. Its members debated crucial issues such as the protection of minority rights, the structure of government, and the inclusion of provisions for socio-economic reforms.
The final document, adopted on January 26, 1950, established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic. It enshrined fundamental rights, directive principles, and the framework for governance, creating a robust and adaptable legal foundation for the country.
In summary, the Constituent Assembly’s role was pivotal in shaping the Indian Constitution. Through detailed debates, inclusive representation, and expert drafting, it produced a document that not only addressed the needs of a diverse society but also laid the groundwork for India’s democratic and constitutional development.

Assignment – III

Question:-06

Ryotwari Settlement

Answer:

The Ryotwari Settlement, implemented in the early 19th century by the British East India Company, was a land revenue system used primarily in South India. Introduced by Sir Thomas Munro, it replaced the earlier Zamindari system, which relied on intermediaries.
Under the Ryotwari Settlement, the government directly engaged with individual landholders, or "ryots," to assess and collect land revenue. This system aimed to simplify tax collection and ensure that revenue was based on the actual land cultivation. Each ryot was responsible for paying taxes on the land they cultivated, which was assessed periodically.
While it provided some security of tenure and a more direct relationship between the state and farmers, the system also faced criticism. High revenue demands often led to economic distress for farmers, and the administrative burden of individual assessments was considerable. Despite these issues, the Ryotwari Settlement significantly influenced land revenue systems in India.

Question:-07

State formation in Hyderabad in the 18 t h 18 t h 18^(th)18^{th}18th century

Answer:

In the 18th century, the state formation in Hyderabad was shaped by the rise of the Asaf Jahi dynasty, founded by Mir Qasim Ali Pasha, also known as Nizam-ul-Mulk. As the Mughal Empire’s influence waned, Nizam-ul-Mulk, who was initially the Mughal governor of the Deccan, established an independent state in Hyderabad in 1724. He skillfully navigated political instability and local rivalries to consolidate power.
The Nizam’s administration introduced significant reforms, including a centralized bureaucracy and a new revenue system, which laid the foundation for Hyderabad’s stability and growth. The state’s strategic location and wealth attracted various external interests, leading to alliances and conflicts with neighboring powers and colonial entities.
By the late 18th century, Hyderabad had emerged as a prominent and influential princely state in southern India, playing a crucial role in regional politics and maintaining relative autonomy amid growing British presence.

Question:-08

The Orientalists in India

Answer:

The Orientalists in India were scholars and intellectuals from Europe who focused on the study of Indian languages, culture, and history during the 18th and 19th centuries. Their work aimed to understand and document India’s rich heritage, often driven by curiosity and colonial interests. Prominent figures included William Jones, who founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784 and significantly contributed to the study of Sanskrit and Indian literature.
Orientalists made substantial contributions to the fields of philology, history, and archaeology, translating ancient texts and promoting the understanding of Indian traditions. However, their work was also critiqued for its Eurocentric perspective, which sometimes distorted or oversimplified Indian culture. Despite these limitations, the Orientalists’ efforts laid the groundwork for future academic study of India and influenced British colonial policies and administrative practices. Their legacy is complex, reflecting both scholarly achievement and colonial attitudes.

Question:-09

Communalism

Answer:

Communalism refers to a socio-political ideology or phenomenon where religious or ethnic communities prioritize their own interests and identities over broader national unity. In many contexts, particularly in South Asia, communalism manifests as conflicts between different religious or ethnic groups, often exacerbated by political manipulation and historical grievances.
In India, communalism has led to significant social and political tensions, with instances of violence and discord between Hindu and Muslim communities, among others. It often arises from economic disparities, political competition, or colonial legacies that deepened communal divisions.
Efforts to address communalism involve promoting secularism, ensuring equal rights for all communities, and fostering interfaith dialogue. However, overcoming communalism requires addressing underlying socio-economic issues and promoting a sense of national identity that transcends communal divisions.

Question:-10

Transfer of Power

Answer:

The Transfer of Power refers to the process by which colonial authority was relinquished and governance was handed over to Indian leaders, culminating in India’s independence from British rule on August 15, 1947. This transition followed extensive negotiations between the British government, Indian political leaders, and representatives of various communities.
Key milestones included the Cripps Mission of 1942, which proposed a framework for self-governance, and the subsequent Quit India Resolution, which demanded immediate independence. The 1947 Independence Act, passed by the British Parliament, formalized the end of British rule and partitioned India into two sovereign states: India and Pakistan.
The transfer was marked by significant political upheaval, communal violence, and the massive migration of populations. Despite the challenges, the transfer of power was a pivotal moment, leading to the establishment of democratic governance and marking the end of colonial dominance in India.

Search Free Solved Assignment

Just Type atleast 3 letters of your Paper Code

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top