Free BPSC-134 Solved Assignment | For July 2025 & January 2026 | INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | IGNOU

BPSC-134: Introduction to International Relations | IGNOU BAG Solved Assignment 2025-26

🌍 BPSC-134: INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

IGNOU Bachelor of Arts General Programme (BAG) Solved Assignment | 2025-26

Course Information

Course Code BPSC-134
Programme Bachelor of Arts General (BAG)
Assignment Code BPSC-134/ASST/TMA/2025-26
Total Marks 100 | Weightage: 30%
🔍
BPSC-134: International Relations - Complete Solutions
📝 Assignment I - Answer in about 500 words each
1. Critically examine the concept of balance of power in world politics.
20 Marks

⚖️ Understanding Balance of Power in Contemporary Global Politics

The concept of balance of power remains one of the most enduring and contentious ideas in international relations theory. Think of it as the global political equivalent of a complex chess game where multiple players constantly adjust their positions to prevent any single actor from achieving dominance. This principle suggests that states naturally seek to prevent the emergence of a hegemonic power that could threaten their sovereignty and security.

🎯 Core Mechanisms of Power Balancing

Balance of power operates through several interconnected mechanisms that shape international behavior. First, internal balancing involves states increasing their own military capabilities, economic strength, and diplomatic influence to counter potential threats. We see this today in defense spending increases across various regions as countries respond to perceived shifts in global power dynamics.

External balancing, conversely, involves forming alliances and partnerships to collectively counter a rising power. The expansion of NATO, the strengthening of QUAD (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue), and various regional security arrangements exemplify this tendency. These coalitions demonstrate how smaller and medium powers aggregate their capabilities to maintain equilibrium against dominant actors.

🌐 Contemporary Relevance and Challenges

In today's multipolar world, balance of power dynamics have become increasingly complex. The rise of China as an economic powerhouse and military modernizer has triggered various balancing responses from the United States and its allies. However, unlike the bipolar Cold War era, contemporary power balancing occurs in a more fluid environment where economic interdependence complicates traditional security calculations.

The concept faces significant criticism in the modern era. Globalization has created economic relationships that make traditional power balancing potentially self-destructive. Countries cannot simply engage in military competition without considering the economic costs of disrupting trade relationships and supply chains. Additionally, transnational challenges like climate change, pandemics, and terrorism require cooperative rather than competitive responses.

💡 Theoretical Limitations and Modern Adaptations

Classical balance of power theory assumes rational state actors operating in an anarchic international system where survival is paramount. However, this framework struggles to explain cooperation in international institutions, the peaceful resolution of disputes, and the role of non-state actors in shaping global politics. Modern scholars have developed more nuanced understandings that incorporate economic interdependence, institutional constraints, and normative considerations.

Furthermore, the theory's Eurocentric origins limit its applicability to different cultural contexts where concepts of power, honor, and state behavior may differ significantly. Many non-Western approaches to international relations emphasize harmony, mutual benefit, and collective security rather than competitive balancing.

🔮 Future Implications and Strategic Considerations

As we move forward, balance of power thinking continues to influence strategic planning and policy formulation worldwide. However, its application must account for new realities including cyber warfare, space militarization, economic statecraft, and the growing importance of soft power resources. The concept remains valuable as one analytical tool among many, but its limitations require careful consideration in an increasingly interconnected and complex international system that demands both competition and cooperation for effective governance.

2. Explain the realist approach to the study of international relations.
20 Marks

🔍 Realist Theory: Understanding International Relations Through Power Politics

Realism stands as the dominant paradigm in international relations scholarship, offering a hard-nosed perspective that views world politics through the lens of power, conflict, and national interest. Imagine international relations as a rough neighborhood where states must constantly watch their backs, accumulate resources, and be prepared to defend themselves because no higher authority exists to protect them. This worldview shapes how millions of policy decisions are made daily across global capitals.

🏛️ Foundational Assumptions of Realist Thought

Realism rests on several core assumptions that distinguish it from other theoretical approaches. The most fundamental is the concept of international anarchy – not chaos, but the absence of a supranational authority above sovereign states. In this environment, states exist in a self-help system where survival depends primarily on their own capabilities and strategic choices.

States are conceived as rational, unitary actors that prioritize security and survival above all other considerations. While domestic politics and individual leaders matter, realists argue that the structure of the international system creates similar behavioral patterns regardless of internal political arrangements. Whether democratic or authoritarian, states face the same fundamental security challenges in an anarchic world.

⚔️ Power as the Central Currency

Power occupies the central position in realist analysis, understood both as means and ends in international politics. Military capabilities, economic resources, geographic advantages, and population size constitute the material foundations of state power. However, realists also recognize that power is relational – it matters not just what capabilities you possess, but how they compare to your competitors and potential adversaries.

The security dilemma emerges as a crucial concept explaining why well-intentioned security measures by one state can inadvertently threaten others, creating cycles of competitive armament and strategic mistrust. This dynamic helps explain why international conflicts persist even when states have no aggressive intentions toward one another.

🌍 Classical vs. Structural Realism

Classical realism, exemplified by thinkers like Hans Morgenthau, emphasizes human nature and the will to power as driving forces in international politics. Leaders and states naturally seek to maximize their power and influence, creating inherent competition and conflict in world affairs.

Structural realism, developed by Kenneth Waltz, shifts focus from human nature to the constraining effects of international system structure. The distribution of power among states – whether bipolar, multipolar, or unipolar – shapes behavior more than individual characteristics or intentions. This perspective explains why rising powers often challenge established orders regardless of their domestic political systems or declared peaceful intentions.

💼 Contemporary Applications and Policy Relevance

Realist insights continue to influence contemporary policy analysis and strategic planning. The theory helps explain great power competition between the United States and China, Russia's assertive foreign policy behavior, and the persistent relevance of military deterrence in international security. Regional power balances in East Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East often conform to realist predictions about state behavior under conditions of shifting power distributions.

🔬 Critiques and Theoretical Limitations

Despite its influence, realism faces significant criticism for its narrow focus on military security and state-centric analysis. Critics argue that the theory inadequately explains international cooperation, the role of international institutions, and the growing importance of economic interdependence in shaping state behavior. Additionally, feminist and postcolonial scholars challenge realism's masculine-coded emphasis on conflict and its neglect of marginalized voices in international politics.

Nevertheless, realism's emphasis on power, security, and the constraining effects of international anarchy continues to provide valuable insights into the persistent competitive dimensions of world politics, making it an indispensable tool for understanding international relations in an uncertain global environment.

📋 Assignment II - Answer in about 250 words each
1. Discuss the different dynamics of power in international politics.
10 Marks

🔋 Understanding Power Dynamics in Global Politics

Power in international politics operates through multiple interconnected dimensions that shape global relationships and outcomes. The traditional conception of hard power emphasizes military capabilities and economic coercion as primary tools of influence. Countries like the United States maintain global military presence while China leverages economic statecraft through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative to extend their reach.

💡 Soft Power and Cultural Influence

Soft power represents the ability to attract and persuade rather than coerce, operating through cultural appeal, political values, and foreign policies that others find legitimate and attractive. Hollywood movies, educational exchanges, and democratic ideals have historically projected American soft power globally. Similarly, cultural diplomacy, language promotion, and international broadcasting help countries shape global narratives and preferences.

🌐 Smart Power and Strategic Integration

Contemporary power dynamics increasingly require smart power – the strategic combination of hard and soft power resources tailored to specific contexts and objectives. Successful international actors carefully calibrate their approach, using economic incentives, military deterrence, diplomatic engagement, and cultural attraction as complementary tools rather than alternatives.

The digital revolution has introduced new power dimensions through cyber capabilities, information warfare, and technological standard-setting. Countries that control critical technologies, data flows, and digital infrastructure gain significant leverage over others. Additionally, structural power – the ability to shape the rules and institutions governing international interactions – remains crucial for maintaining long-term influence in global affairs.

2. Explain the significant tenets of neoliberalism.
10 Marks

🤝 Neoliberalism: Cooperation in an Anarchic World

Neoliberalism in international relations theory emphasizes the possibility of cooperation and mutual benefit despite international anarchy. Unlike realists who focus on conflict and competition, neoliberals argue that states can achieve common interests through institutions, repeated interactions, and economic interdependence. This perspective helps explain the proliferation of international organizations and multilateral agreements in the modern era.

🏦 Institutional Solutions to Collective Problems

Central to neoliberal thinking is the belief that international institutions can overcome collective action problems and provide mechanisms for sustained cooperation. Organizations like the World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, and various regional bodies create rules, monitor compliance, and facilitate dispute resolution. These institutions reduce transaction costs, increase transparency, and create incentives for long-term cooperation over short-term gains.

💰 Economic Interdependence and Peace

Neoliberals emphasize how economic interdependence creates mutual vulnerabilities that make conflict costly and cooperation beneficial. Countries integrated into global trade networks have strong incentives to maintain peaceful relations to protect economic benefits. Complex interdependence theory suggests that multiple channels of communication and interaction beyond government-to-government relations create webs of relationships that constrain state behavior.

The democratic peace theory, associated with neoliberal thought, proposes that democratic states rarely fight each other due to shared norms, institutional constraints, and economic interests. This perspective has influenced policies promoting democratization and market economics as paths to international stability and peace.

3. Discuss the role and functions of United Nations Security Council in the 21st century.
10 Marks

🛡️ UN Security Council: Guardian of Global Peace and Security

The UN Security Council serves as the primary international body responsible for maintaining peace and security in the 21st century, wielding unique legal authority to authorize military action, impose sanctions, and establish peacekeeping missions. Composed of fifteen members including five permanent members with veto power (United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom), the Council represents both the promise and limitations of collective security in contemporary international relations.

⚡ Key Functions and Powers

The Council's primary responsibilities include investigating international disputes, determining threats to peace, recommending peaceful settlement procedures, and authorizing enforcement measures including economic sanctions and military intervention. Recent decades have seen expanded interpretations of threats to include humanitarian crises, terrorism, climate change, and pandemic diseases, reflecting evolving security challenges.

Peacekeeping operations represent one of the Council's most visible functions, with over 100,000 personnel deployed globally in complex missions that often combine traditional ceasefire monitoring with broader state-building activities. These missions increasingly operate in fragile states facing internal conflicts rather than traditional interstate wars.

🔄 Contemporary Challenges and Reform Debates

The Council faces significant challenges in the 21st century, including great power rivalry among permanent members that frequently results in deadlock through veto use. The composition reflecting post-World War II power distribution appears increasingly outdated given the rise of new powers and changing global dynamics. Reform proposals seek to address representation gaps, particularly regarding developing countries and regional powers, though achieving consensus on changes remains extremely difficult due to institutional and political obstacles.

📝 Assignment III - Answer in about 100 words each
1. Multilateralism
6 Marks

🌐 Multilateralism in Global Governance

Multilateralism refers to the practice of coordinating relations and policies among three or more states through international institutions and diplomatic processes. This approach emphasizes collective decision-making, shared responsibility, and adherence to agreed-upon rules and norms. Examples include the United Nations system, World Trade Organization, and various regional arrangements. Multilateralism contrasts with unilateral action or bilateral relationships by promoting inclusive participation and consensus-building. Contemporary challenges to multilateralism include rising nationalism, great power competition, and the difficulty of achieving consensus among diverse actors with varying interests and capabilities in an increasingly complex global environment.

2. ASEAN
6 Marks

🏛️ ASEAN: Southeast Asian Regional Integration

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), established in 1967, represents one of the world's most successful regional organizations, comprising ten member states with over 650 million people. ASEAN operates through the distinctive "ASEAN Way" emphasizing consensus-building, non-interference in domestic affairs, and informal consultation processes. The organization has evolved from a primarily political-security focused body to encompass extensive economic integration through the ASEAN Free Trade Area and ASEAN Economic Community. ASEAN also serves as a crucial platform for managing great power relations in the Indo-Pacific region, providing smaller states with collective bargaining power and diplomatic leverage in dealings with major powers like China and the United States.

3. Ideological dimension of the Cold War
6 Marks

⚔️ Ideological Battle: Democracy vs. Communism

The Cold War's ideological dimension centered on fundamental disagreements about political organization, economic systems, and human values between capitalist democracy and socialist communism. The United States championed individual freedom, market economics, and democratic governance, while the Soviet Union promoted collective ownership, centralized planning, and socialist democracy. This ideological competition extended beyond the superpowers to influence decolonization processes, development strategies, and political movements worldwide. The struggle manifested in propaganda campaigns, cultural exchanges, educational programs, and support for allied governments and movements. The ideological framework provided moral justification for geopolitical competition and shaped public understanding of the conflict as a battle between fundamentally incompatible ways of organizing society and human relationships.

4. Cultural Globalization
6 Marks

🎭 Cultural Globalization: Blending and Homogenization

Cultural globalization refers to the worldwide exchange and integration of cultural practices, values, symbols, and meanings through increased interconnectedness and communication technologies. This process involves the spread of ideas, languages, customs, and lifestyles across national boundaries, facilitated by media, migration, tourism, and digital platforms. While creating opportunities for cross-cultural understanding and hybrid cultural forms, cultural globalization also raises concerns about cultural homogenization and the dominance of Western, particularly American, cultural products and values. The phenomenon manifests in global brands, international entertainment, fusion cuisines, and shared cultural references, while simultaneously generating local resistance and efforts to preserve distinctive cultural identities. Contemporary debates focus on balancing global integration with cultural diversity and authenticity.

5. Constructivism
6 Marks

🏗️ Constructivism: Ideas Shape Reality

Constructivism in international relations theory emphasizes how social interactions, shared ideas, and intersubjective meanings shape international politics rather than material factors alone. This approach argues that concepts like sovereignty, security, and national interest are socially constructed through historical processes and ongoing interactions rather than fixed natural phenomena. Constructivists focus on how norms, identities, and cultures influence state behavior and international outcomes. For example, the idea that democracies don't fight each other becomes self-reinforcing through shared beliefs and expectations. Key scholars like Alexander Wendt argue that "anarchy is what states make of it," suggesting that the meaning of international anarchy depends on how states interpret and respond to it through their interactions, making ideas and identity crucial variables in understanding world politics.

Search Free Solved Assignment

Just Type atleast 3 letters of your Paper Code

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top