0 of 150 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 150 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Average score |
|
Your score |
|
Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Table is loading | ||||
No data available | ||||
The ‘doctrine of joint liability’ as envisaged by Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is based on the decision of the following: [UP JS 2018]
As defined in I.P.C. a “Woman” denotes a female human being of: [MP JS 2017]
Af the act is a lawful one and not a criminal act and if in the course of such act any one of the person’s jointly doing that act commits an offence, then: [AILET 2018, HCJ 2018]
*A‘ filed a FIR giving details of a crime that he had committed. There were no exculpatory statements in the FIR and gave all the details regarding the eommission of the crime. Which of the following statements is accurate: [DJS 2018]
The case law of State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George comes under which provision of IPC? [TN APO 2019]
The term “he” used under Indian Panel Code relates to a person who is: [UK JS 2017]
In Indian Penal Code the pronoun ‘he’ and its derivatives are used for: [RCJ 2014, UP HJS 2018]
In IPC the word ‘Woman’ denotes to: [MP APPO 2008]
Under Section 10 of IPC “Man” denotes a male human being of: [Chhat ADPPO 2008]
In the Indian Penal Code, the word ‘woman’ denotes: [MPJS 2011]
Which of the following statement correctly reflects the cardinal principle, ‘Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea’? [Jhar JS 2019, UGC-NET 2019]
Under the Indian Penal Code, a person is defined as: [APJS 2011]
Homicide cannot be defined as killing of a person by a person in view of the nature of the definition of the word ‘person’ in: [HJS 2016]
Section 13 IPC which was repealed gave the detinition of: [TN APO 2019]
In context to the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ‘India’ means: [HPJS 2013]
Who, according to Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, is not a public servant: [Raj HJS 2012, UP HJS 2018]
In which Section of IPC, ‘public servant’ is defined? [Raj APO 2007, HPJS 2012]
Who among the following is not a public servant? [UP APO 2009]
It was held that a Chief Minister or a Minister in in the pay of the Government and, therefore, public servant within the meaning of Section 21(2) of IPC in the case: [HHJS 2011]
Which of the following is not a “public servant” within the meaning of Section 21 of the Code: [MP HJS 2008, MPJS 2009]
One of the following is not a public servant: [UJS 2002, AJS 2011, HJS 2013]
Which of the following is not a Public Servant? [MPJS 2010]
Who among the following is not a ‘Public Servant’ within the meaning of Section 21 of Indian Penal Code? [MJS 2011]
Who among the following defined crime as “an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law either forbidding or commanding it”? [UGC-NET 2018]
lf an accused of a crime wants to take advantage of general exceptions given in IPC who has to prove the applicability of these exceptions? [ILI (LLM) 2019]
‘Movable property’ under IPC is defined in: [Raj APO 2007]
The definition of movable property under section 22 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 excludes ………….. [UP HJS 2014]
What is not movable property under Section 22, IPC? [MPJS 2007]
Definition of ‘wrongful gain’ is ag follows: [APJS 2011]
The word “public servant” denotes: A person falling under ……….. [UK CJS 2018]
Which one of the following Sections of IPC defines ‘Gaining Wrongfully and Losing Wrongfully’? [HPJS 2013]
When a person gains something by unlawful means to which he is not legally entitled it is: [MPJS 2012]
‘Wrongful gain’ and ‘wrongful loss’ have been defined under Indian Penal Code, 1860 in: [UP PCS CJ 2008, UK CJS 2018]
A person acts dishonestly when he does anything: [DU LLM Entrance 2010]
Which of the following is not a constituent of Tort? [UGC-NET 2019]
Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the code given below:
List-I
(a) Mehboob Shah v. Emperor
(b) State of Maharashtra v. M.H.
(c) Director of Public Prosecutions
(d) R.V. Dudley v. Stephens
List-II
(i) Mens rea
(ii) Intoxication George
(iii) Common v. Beard Intention
(iv) Necessity
Consider the following statements: Anything is said to have been done dishonestly if it has been done with intention to 1. cause wrongful loss to any person and wrongful gain to another person. 2. cause injury to any person. Which of the statements given above is/ are correct?
Is it an indispensable element of dishonesty as defined in Section 24 with Section 23 that the alleged wrongful gain should be intended to be caused to a person who is not legally entitled to the property? [AILET 2019]
The term ‘Dishonestly’ as defined under Section 24 of the IPC implies: [DU LLM Entrance 2014}
Word ‘Dishonestly’ as defined in Section 24 of IPC means: [MPJS 2012]
Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person is said to do that thing: [CJS 2016]
Which of the following match is wrong? [Punj JS 2017]
As per Section 24 of Indian Penal Code, who ever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person, is said to do that thing: [Guj HJS 2019]
Which one of the following does not amount to ‘fraud’? [DU LLM Entrance 2008]
“Fraudulently intention” has been defined as “intent to defraud but not otherwise” in the Indian Penal Code in Section: [ILI LLM 2010]
A person does not have ‘reason to believe’ a thing if he does not have any: [HSJS 2012]
The term Dishonestly under IPC hag been defined as doing something: [DU LLM Entrance 2012]
A person causes one thing to resemble another thing to practice deception is said to commit: [ILI LLM 2012]
‘Counterfeit’ under IPC is defined in: [Raj APO 2007]
Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched? [UP PCS CJ 2013]
Abetting the Commission of suicide is given under: [AIBE 2018]
‘Electronic Record’ under IPC is defined in: [Raj APO 2007]
Section 29A of I.P.C. is related to: [UK CJS 2018]
Valuable security is defined in: [MP HJS 2009]
Which one of the following is not a valuable security? [UP PCS 2003]
As per IPC a document whereby any legal right is created, extended, restricted or released, is: [APJS 2011]
Which of the following match is wrong? [PJS 2017]
Mr. X, an injured makes certain statements to the investigating officer. Later he succumbs to those injuries and died. With respect to Section 32 of the Evidence Act, the statements so made are: [Punj PSC 2018]
Which one of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 defines the word ‘Act’? [UP PCS CJ 2015]
‘X’ armed with a loaded pistol and ‘Y’ empty handed go to ’Z’ shop in furtherance of their common intention to commit robbery, X enters the shop and on being resisted in carrying away property shoots Z with pistol. Z dies at once. For what acts of X, Y is liable: [MP PCS 1996]
Which of the following is true regarding Section 34 of the IPC: [DU LLM Entrance 2012]
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860: [DU LLM Entrance 2011, WB SCJS 2011, JHS 2011, UP PCS CJ 2015, Bihar HJS 2019]
Give correct response, in J. M. Desai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1960 S. C. 889, Mr. Desai was the Managing Director of a Dying Company, the company entered into a contract with the textile Commissioner undertaking to dye a large quantity of cloth. Out of the lot some were returned back to the
commissioner by the company while others, even after repeated demand,
remained undelivered. Therefore, the Managing Director was charged for an
offence and he pleaded that the clothes were eaten up by white ants and that
he was not personally responsible
Give the correct response. [AILET 2019]
Four accused with common intention to kill, shot one B in the bona fide belief that B was A. In this case: [UGC-NET 2018]
Principle: When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone. Factual Situation: A, B, C and D who were unemployed, decided to loot the house of a rich businessman one night. When all of them were about to jump the compound wall, D decided to remain at the gate and warn them, in case of any problem. A, B and C entered the house and took cash and gold ornaments. While coming out of the house B tripped on a ru
What constitutes the gist of an offence under section 34, IPC? [DU LLM Entrance 2008]
Imputed Criminal Liability Principle is laid down in which of the following provision/provisions: [CLAT LLM 2011]
A, B, C, D and E entered the house of a prosperous businessman at 12.30 AM breaking open the kitchen door. Having planned to rob, they administered chloroform to the middle aged couple. While A, B, C and D managed to find money and gold ornaments in one of the cupboards, E went up to the first floor to look for more cupboards. When he entered the bedroom upstairs he found a beautiful girl fast asleep. After administering chloroform, he raped her and then rushed downstairs not venturing to steal anything. However, while leaving the gate, all the
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code deals with: [ILI LLM 2012]
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, recognizes one out of the following principles of criminal jurisprudence: [TLI LLM 2011, 2014]
When a criminal act is done by several persons, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone if it is done in furtherance of: [ILI LLM 2010]
Common intention under Section 34 implies: [HPJS 2011, J Pre JS 2014, AILET 2016]
In cases of common intention which of the following statements hold true? [AILET 2016]
In case of Kidnapping, a minor male means a person of age under: [TN APO 2019]
A holds Z down and fraudulently takes Z’s jewels. What offence A has committed? [TN APO 2019]
In which of the following cases the Privy Council made a distinction between ‘common intention’ and ‘similar intention’? [MP APPO 2003, HPJS 2015]
The principle of common intention applies only when: [Raj APO 2007]
Under which one of the following Sections of Indian Penal Code, the principle of ‘joint criminal liability’ is applicable? [UK APO 2010]
Under Section 34 of Indian Penal Code: [MP CJ 2018]
Judgment in Mahboob Shah v. Emperor, AIR 1945 PC 118 explained the penal law relating to: [HJS 2017]
X gave poisoned halva to Y with an intention to kill him. Y ate one morsel and kept it on the side: Z who was sitting there, picked it up and ate it. Z died: [ATLEY 2019]
Which one of the following statements is correct? Joint criminal liability based on common intention requires that: [DAPP 2005]
X with the intention to steal ornaments opened Y’s box and found it empty. Which of the following statements is correct? [UGC-NET 2019]
In which one of the following cases was the distinction between common intention and similar intention pointed out? [DAPP 2005]
Which of the following is not a meaning of the expression ‘common intention’ under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code? [UP APO 2009]
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each one of them is liable? [UPSC CS 1998, UP APO 2006, PJS 2010]
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all: [MP APPO 2009, UP HJS 2009, PJS 2011, HADA 2016]
The self evident principle of criminal justice is based on: [UGC-NET 2017]
The care of Mahboob Shah v. Emperor ware decide by which one of the following Courts? [HPJS (Pre) 2018]
What is the basic difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of IPC? [UPSC CS 2008]
Which of the following distinguishes section 34 of IPC from section 149, IPC? 1. Section 149 creates a substantive offence whereas section 34 does not create an offence. 2. Section 149 requires common object whereas section 34 requires common intention, 3. Section 149 requires five or more persons whereas section 34 requires two or more persons, Select the correct answer by using the codes given below: [UPSC CS 2007]
Which of the following is false of Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code? [Guj CJS 2019]
‘A’, B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ are charged for murder of ‘E’, But evidence proved that ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ along with three others jointly committed the offence. The court acquits ‘A’, ‘B’ ‘C’, but convicts ‘D’. In the context of the above, which one of the following statements is correct? [UPSC CS 2006]
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding a criminal act done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all is: [DJS 2019 (II)]
Which one of the following statements regarding Sections 34 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code is correct? [UPSC CS 2005]
Section 34 of IPC provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations: 1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A’s house 2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang 3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence 4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale) Which of the situation given above reflect(s) the correct ingredients with regard to Section 34? [UPSC CS 2005]
The various words used to denote Mens Rea under the IPC and are defined in the code itself are: [AIBE 2017]
Consider the following statements: 1. Section 34 of IPC requires two persons whereas Section 149 of IPC require five persons. 2. Section 34 of IPC requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of IPC requires common object 3. Section 34 of IPC and Section 149 of IPC both require presence of a prior consent 4. Section 34 of IPC and section 149 of IPC. Both create specific offence Which of the above statements are correct? [UPSC CS 2001]
Which one of the following brings out the distinction between Section 34 and 149 of the IPC? [UPSC CS 1999, JJS 2016]
Which of the following among item A and item B are correct? Item A: Common intention within the meaning of Section 34 of the Penal Code means: 1. evil intention of many persons to commit the same act 2. implication of a pre-arranged plan, prior meeting of mind, between all the persons constituting the group 3. a desire of several persons to commit an act without contemplating the consequences Item B: Within the meaning of section 149 in prosecution of common object of an unlawful assembly’s means: 1. in relation to common intention of the group
Consider the following statement: Section 34 of the IPC does not apply where: 1. five or more person assembled where one killed A 2. Aand B who are enemies of C decided distinctly of kill C. A killed C when B was also present 3. the presence of any person, who participated in the pre-arranged plan, is not necessary at the time of actual commission of the crime 4. privity of mind of all the accused is an essential ingredient for the commission of crime of these statements: [UPSC CS 1997]
It was alleged that ‘L’ ’M’, ‘N’, ‘P, ‘Q’ and ‘R’ with common object of taking forcible possession of land belonging to ‘Y’ entered his land, ‘P’ caused grievous hurt to ‘Y’ for the purpose of taking such possession. Presence of ‘Q’ and ‘R’ was doubted by the Court. Which one of the following statements is correct is this regard? [UPSC CS 1996]
Common intention implies: [UPSC CS 1996]
When a criminal act is done by several persons, in furtherance of a common intention of all, each of such persons is liable: [UPSC CS 1994, PJS 2010]
‘A’ is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one of the following situations can his offence be proved? [UPSC CS 1994]
Accused persons were charged under section 302 read with section 149, IPC. The existence of common intention amongst the accused persons was established from the surrounding circumstances and from their conduct on the spot. No charge had been framed under section 34, IPC. In such case: [DHJS 2014]
The difference between section 34 and section 149 of IPC is that ………. [HJS 2011, DJS 2014, 2015, DU LLM Entrance 2015, 2016, Jhar JS 2019]
Common intention means: [UP APO 2002, HPJ 2009]
Which one of the following is not an essential element of Section 34 of Indian Panel Code? [UP PCS 2003]
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all each of them is liable: [DJS 2007]
Which one of the following cases is a case relating to Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code? [UJS 2009]
For the application of Section 34, IPC, there must be at least: [PJS 2010]
In which case the court made a clear distinction between ‘common intention’ and ‘similar intention’? [UJS 2010]
Which of the following statement is correct? [DJS 2011]
To establish Section 34 of IPC: [Chatt ADPPO 2006, PJS 2011]
Give correct response with respect to the difference between Section 34 and 149: [PJS 2011]
The phrase “in furtherance of common intention of all” used in Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, is: [UP PCS CJ 2013]
When several persons do a Criminal act in furtherance to the common intention: [KCJ 2012]
In which one of the following cases Lord Summer said, “they also serve who stand and wait”? [UJS 2014]
Read the following: (1) R. v. McNaughten is the case related with insanity as a defence. (2) R. v. Govinda is-the case related with a common intention. Of the above: [Punj PSC 2018]
‘A’, a woman knowing that his husband ‘B’ has recently committed dacoity, harbours him with the intention of screening him from punishment. In this case ‘A’ is: [UGC-NET 2018]
‘A’ enters into the house of ‘B’ with the intention to commit theft. ‘B’ along with other members of his family surround and attack ‘A’ with wooden sticks. ‘A’ finding his life in danger fires with pistol causing death to ‘B’. Here ‘A’ has committed: [UGC-NET 2018]
“Common intention” and “similar intention” was distinguished in the famous case of: [UJS 2015, HRJS 2015, HADA 2016]
Which of the following statement/ statements is/are not correct? (i) Both Sections 34 and 149 of IPC itself create specific offences (ii) Both Sections 34 and 149 of IPC relate to Doctrine of Vicarious liability (iii) Section 34 fixes a minimum two persons who must share common intention while Section 149 requires there must be at least 10 persons to have the common object
(iv) Some active participation is necessary under Section 34 but Section 149 does not require it. Mere member of the unlawful Assembly with common
object is sufficient for
Which of the following statements is not correct: [RJS 2016]
Which one of the following elements is not essential for the applications of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860? [UP PCS CJ 2008]
To impose joint liability under Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, the prosecution needs to prove: [DU LLM Entrance 2010]
‘A’ intentionally causes ‘Z’s death partly by illegally omitting to give ‘Z’ food and partly by beating ‘Z’, ‘A’ is liable for murder by virtue of which one of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code? [RJS 2011]
To prosecute a person under Section 37 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the following requirement is essential: [ILI LLM 2014]
Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code, defines ‘Voluntarily’? [UK CJS 2018]
The term ‘offence’ as defined in IPC means: [AILET 2016]
“Offence” is defined under: [Chhat ADPPO 2008, UJS 2010, HPJS 2011, Jhar APO 2012, HJS 2013]
“Local Law” mentioned under Section 42 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 means a law applicable to: [UJS 2014]
In IPC the word illegal is applicable to which of the following? [MP APPO 2008]
Under Section 43 of the IPC, the word “illegal” is not applicable to everything: [MP HJS 2011]
To which one of the following the word ‘Illegal’ used under Section 43 of IPC is not applicable? [JJS 2014]
Which one of the following statements is correct? Injury is any harm whatever illegally caused to any person in his: [UPSC CS 2007]
The word ‘injury’ in Section 44 of IPC denotes harm illegally caused to: [HSJS 2012]
Under Section 44 of IPC, the term ‘Injury” means any harm: [HPJS 2015]
Under section 45 of IPC, life denotes: [AJS 2011, CLAT LLM 2015, Bihar HJS 2019]
A person is believed to have acted in good faith when it is proven that the accused: (DU LLM Entrance 2010]
Good faith within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code means: [UPSC CS 1999, UPSC 2001, UJS 2014, DU LLM Entrance 2015, AILET 2016, DJS 2018-19]
Meaning of good faith under IPC is doing any thing: [HSJS 2012]
The word ‘good faith’ is defined in the Indian Penal Code in: [UP APO 2002, HPJ 2009]
Under the Indian Penal Code, nothing is said to be done or believed in ‘good faith’ which is done or believed: [CBI, APP 2015]
Match the items of List I with the items of List II and choose the correct answer from the code given below. List I List I
(Provision for) (Section of 1.P.C.)
(a) General explanation of (i) Section 45
‘lite’
(b) Act of judge when acting — (di) Section 52
judicially
{c) Act of child under seven (iii) Section 77
years of age
(d) Explanation of ‘Good (iv) Section 82
faith’
Codes:
(a) (b) (c) (d)
[UGC-NET 2018]
According to Section 52 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, nothing is said to be done or believed in good faith which is done or believed without ……………. [PJS 2017]
Under which of the following Sections of the IPC ‘harbouring’ has been defined? [Phar APO 2012]
According to the IPC 1860, which one among the following is not an offence? [DAPP 2010]