1.(a) मान लीजिए कि S_(3)S_3 व Z_(3)Z_3 क्रमशः 3 प्रतीकों का क्रमचय समूह एवं मॉड्यूल 3 अवशिष्ट वर्गों के समूह हैं। दर्शाइए कि S_(3)S_3 का Z_(3)Z_3 में तुच्छ समाकारिता के अतिरिक्त कोई भी समाकारिता नहीं है ।
Let S_(3)S_3 and Z_(3)Z_3 be permutation group on 3 symbols and group of residue classes module 3 respectively. Show that there is no homomorphism of S_(3)S_3 in Z_(3)Z_3 except the trivial homomorphism.
Answer:
To show that there is no homomorphism of S_(3)S_3 into Z_(3)Z_3 except the trivial homomorphism, we can use the following properties of homomorphisms:
A homomorphism phi:G rarr H\phi: G \to H preserves the identity element, i.e., phi(e_(G))=e_(H)\phi(e_G) = e_H.
A homomorphism phi:G rarr H\phi: G \to H preserves the group operation, i.e., phi(a**b)=phi(a)**phi(b)\phi(a \ast b) = \phi(a) \ast \phi(b).
A homomorphism phi:G rarr H\phi: G \to H preserves the order of elements, i.e., if aa has order nn in GG, then phi(a)\phi(a) has order dividing nn in HH.
Properties of S_(3)S_3 and Z_(3)Z_3
S_(3)S_3 is the permutation group on 3 symbols, and it has 3!=63! = 6 elements.
Z_(3)Z_3 is the group of residue classes modulo 3, and it has 3 elements: [0],[1],[2][0], [1], [2].
Steps to Show No Non-Trivial Homomorphism Exists
Identity Element: Any homomorphism phi:S_(3)rarrZ_(3)\phi: S_3 \to Z_3 must map the identity element of S_(3)S_3 (the identity permutation ee) to the identity element of Z_(3)Z_3 ([0][0]).
phi(e)=[0]\phi(e) = [0]
Order of Elements: The order of any element in Z_(3)Z_3 divides 3. In S_(3)S_3, we have elements of order 2 (e.g., transpositions) and elements of order 3 (e.g., 3-cycles). If there exists a non-trivial homomorphism phi\phi, then it must map elements of S_(3)S_3 to elements of Z_(3)Z_3 in such a way that the order of the image divides the order of the original element.
However, Z_(3)Z_3 only has elements of order 1 ([0][0]) and order 3 ([1],[2][1], [2]). There are no elements of order 2 in Z_(3)Z_3.
Contradiction: S_(3)S_3 contains elements of order 2 (transpositions). Any homomorphism phi\phi would have to map these elements to an element in Z_(3)Z_3 whose order divides 2. Since Z_(3)Z_3 contains no such elements (other than the identity), we reach a contradiction.
Therefore, the only homomorphism that can exist from S_(3)S_3 to Z_(3)Z_3 is the trivial homomorphism that maps all elements of S_(3)S_3 to the identity element [0][0] in Z_(3)Z_3.
1.(b) मान लीजिए RR मुख्य गुणजावली प्रान्त है । दर्शाइए कि RR के विभाग-वलय की प्रत्येक गुणजावली, मुख्य गुणजावली है तथा R//P,RR / P, R के अभाज्यगुणजावली PP के लिए मुख्य गुणजावली प्रान्त है ।
Let RR be a principal ideal domain. Show that every ideal of a quotient ring of RR is principal ideal and R//PR / P is a principal ideal domain for a prime ideal PP of RR.
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to prove two things:
Every ideal of a quotient ring R//PR/P is a principal ideal.
If PP is a prime ideal of RR, then R//PR/P is a principal ideal domain (PID).
To prove these statements, we’ll use the properties of principal ideal domains and quotient rings.
Work/Calculations
Part 1: Every ideal of R//PR/P is a principal ideal
Let I//PI/P be an ideal of R//PR/P, where II is an ideal of RR containing PP.
Step 1: Show that II is a principal ideal in RR
Since RR is a PID, II is generated by a single element aa in RR. That is,
I=(a)I = (a)
Step 2: Show that I//PI/P is generated by a+Pa+P in R//PR/P
Let’s substitute the values:
I//P=(a)+PI/P = (a) + P
After substituting, we can see that I//PI/P is generated by a+Pa+P in R//PR/P.
Therefore, I//PI/P is a principal ideal in R//PR/P.
Part 2: R//PR/P is a PID for a prime ideal PP of RR
Step 1: Show that R//PR/P is an integral domain
Since PP is a prime ideal, R//PR/P is an integral domain.
Step 2: Show that every ideal in R//PR/P is principal
From Part 1, we know that every ideal in R//PR/P is principal.
Step 3: Conclude that R//PR/P is a PID
Since R//PR/P is an integral domain and every ideal in R//PR/P is principal, R//PR/P is a PID.
Conclusion
We have shown that every ideal of a quotient ring R//PR/P is a principal ideal. Additionally, if PP is a prime ideal of RR, then R//PR/P is a principal ideal domain. Both of these statements hold true when RR is a principal ideal domain.
1.(c) सिद्ध कीजिए कि शर्त |a_(n+1)-a_(n)| <= alpha|a_(n)-a_(n-1)|\left|a_{n+1}-a_n\right| \leqslant \alpha\left|a_n-a_{n-1}\right|, जहाँ पर 0 < alpha < 10<\alpha<1 को सभी प्राकृतिक संख्याओं n >= 2n \geqslant 2 के लिए सन्तुष्ट करने वाला अनुक्रम (a_(n)^(‘))\left(a_n^{\prime}\right), कॉशी-अनुक्रम होता है ।
Prove that the sequence (a_(n))\left(a_n\right) satisfying the condition |a_(n+1)-a_(n)| <= alpha|a_(n)-a_(n-1)|,0 < alpha < 1\left|a_{n+1}-a_n\right| \leqslant \alpha\left|a_n-a_{n-1}\right|, 0<\alpha<1 for all natural numbers n >= 2n \geqslant 2, is a Cauchy sequence.
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to prove that a sequence (a_(n))\left(a_n\right) satisfying the condition
for all natural numbers n >= 2n \geqslant 2, is a Cauchy sequence. A sequence is said to be Cauchy if for every epsilon > 0\epsilon > 0, there exists an NN such that for all m,n > Nm, n > N, |a_(m)-a_(n)| < epsilon|a_m – a_n| < \epsilon.
Work/Calculations
Step 1: Prove that |a_(n+1)-a_(n)|\left|a_{n+1} – a_n\right| becomes arbitrarily small
After substituting, we see that as nn becomes large, alpha ^(n)\alpha^n approaches zero (since 0 < alpha < 10 < \alpha < 1), making |a_(n+1)-a_(n)|\left|a_{n+1}-a_n\right| arbitrarily small.
Step 2: Prove that (a_(n))\left(a_n\right) is a Cauchy sequence
To prove that (a_(n))\left(a_n\right) is a Cauchy sequence, we need to show that for any epsilon > 0\epsilon > 0, there exists an NN such that for all m,n > Nm, n > N, |a_(m)-a_(n)| < epsilon|a_m – a_n| < \epsilon.
We can make this less than epsilon\epsilon by choosing NN large enough so that alpha ^(N)|a_(2)-a_(1)|(1)/(1-alpha) < epsilon\alpha^N|a_2 – a_1| \frac{1}{1 – \alpha} < \epsilon.
Conclusion
We have shown that for any epsilon > 0\epsilon > 0, there exists an NN such that for all m,n > Nm, n > N, |a_(m)-a_(n)| < epsilon|a_m – a_n| < \epsilon. Therefore, the sequence (a_(n))\left(a_n\right) is a Cauchy sequence, as required.
1.(d) समाकल int _(C)(z^(2)+3z)dz\int_C\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z का, (2,0)(2,0) से (0,2)(0,2) तक वक्र CC के वामावर्त अनुगत जहाँ पर CC वृत्त |z|=2|z|=2 है, मान निकालिए ।
Evaluate the integral int _(C)(z^(2)+3z)dz\int_C\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z counterclockwise from (2,0)(2,0) to (0,2)(0,2) along the curve CC, where CC is the circle |z|=2|z|=2.
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to evaluate the integral int _(C)(z^(2)+3z)dz\int_C\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z counterclockwise from (2,0)(2,0) to (0,2)(0,2) along the curve CC, where CC is the circle |z|=2|z|=2.
Given Parameters and Parametrization
Given |z|=2|z|=2, i.e. z=2e^(i theta)quadz=2 e^{i \theta} \quad and quad0 <= theta <= (pi)/(2)\quad 0 \leq \theta \leq \frac{\pi}{2}.
Integral Setup
:.int _(C)(z^(2)+3z)dz=int_(|z|=2)(z^(2)+3z)dz\therefore \int_C\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z =\int_{|z|=2}\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z
Substitution and Simplification
=int_(0)^(pi//2)[(2e^(i theta))^(2)+3(2e^(i theta))]2e^(i theta)*id theta=\int_0^{\pi / 2}\left[\left(2 e^{i \theta}\right)^2+3\left(2 e^{i \theta}\right)\right] 2 e^{i \theta} \cdot i d \theta
Evaluation of the Integral
=[8i(e^(3i theta))/(3i)+12 i(e^(2i theta))/(2i)]_(0)^((pi)/(2))=\left[8 i \frac{e^{3 i \theta}}{3 i}+12 i \frac{e^{2 i \theta}}{2 i}\right]_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}
The integral int _(C)(z^(2)+3z)dz\int_C\left(z^2+3 z\right) d z along the curve CC, where CC is the circle |z|=2|z|=2, is (-44)/(3)-(8)/(3)i\frac{-44}{3}-\frac{8}{3} i.
1.(e) यू.पी.एस.सी. के रखरखाव विभाग ने भवन में पर्दों की आवश्यकता-पूर्ति हेतु पर्दा-कपडे के पर्याप्त संख्या में टुकड़े खरीदे हैं। प्रत्येक टुकड़े की लम्बाई 17 फुट है। पर्दों की लम्बाई के अनुसार आवश्यकता निम्नलिखित है : {:[” पर्दे की लम्बाई (फुटों में) आवश्यक संख्या “],[5,700],[9,400],[7,300]:}\begin{array}{cc}\text { पर्दे की लम्बाई (फुटों में) आवश्यक संख्या } \\ 5 & 700 \\ 9 & 400 \\ 7 & 300\end{array}
टुकडों एवं सभी पर्दों की चौड़ाइयाँ समान हैं। विभिन्न रूप से काटे गये टुकड़ों की संख्या का निर्णय इस प्रकार करने हेतु कि कुल कटान-हानि न्यूनतम हो, एक रैखिक प्रोग्रामन समस्या का प्रामाणिक इस प्रकार करने हेतु कि कुल कटान-हानि न्यूनतम हो, एक रैखिक प्रोग्रामन समस्या का प्रामाणिक रूप में निर्धारण कीजिए । इसका एक आधारी सुसंगत हल भी दीजिए ।
UPSC maintenance section has purchased sufficient number of curtain cloth pieces to meet the curtain requirement of its building. The length of each piece is 17 feet. The requirement according to curtain length is as follows: {:[” Curtain length (in feet) “,” Number required “],[5,700],[9,400],[7,300]:}\begin{array}{cc}\text { Curtain length (in feet) } & \text { Number required } \\ 5 & 700 \\ 9 & 400 \\ 7 & 300\end{array}
The width of all curtains is same as that of available pieces. Form a linear programming problem in standard form that decides the number of pieces cut in different ways so that the total trim loss is minimum. Also give a basic feasible solution to it.
Answer:
Introduction
The UPSC maintenance section has purchased curtain cloth pieces, each of length 17 feet, to meet the curtain requirements of its building. The goal is to cut these 17-foot pieces into smaller lengths of 5, 9, and 7 feet to meet the specific requirements while minimizing the total trim loss. We will formulate this as a linear programming problem (LPP) in standard form.
Variables
Let x_(1)x_1 be the number of 17-foot pieces cut into one 5-foot piece and one 12-foot piece.
Let x_(2)x_2 be the number of 17-foot pieces cut into one 9-foot piece and one 8-foot piece.
Let x_(3)x_3 be the number of 17-foot pieces cut into one 7-foot piece and one 10-foot piece.
Objective Function
The objective is to minimize the total trim loss, which is the sum of the remaining lengths after cutting the 17-foot pieces. The total trim loss TT can be represented as:
“Minimize “T=12x_(1)+8x_(2)+10x_(3)\text{Minimize } T = 12x_1 + 8x_2 + 10x_3
Constraints
The number of 5-foot pieces should be at least 700: x_(1) >= 700x_1 \geq 700
The number of 9-foot pieces should be at least 400: x_(2) >= 400x_2 \geq 400
The number of 7-foot pieces should be at least 300: x_(3) >= 300x_3 \geq 300
All variables must be non-negative: x_(1),x_(2),x_(3) >= 0x_1, x_2, x_3 \geq 0
Linear Programming Problem in Standard Form
“Minimize “T=12x_(1)+8x_(2)+10x_(3)\text{Minimize } T = 12x_1 + 8x_2 + 10x_3
A basic feasible solution can be obtained by setting the slack variables to zero and solving the constraints for x_(1),x_(2),x_(3),x_1, x_2, x_3, and TT.
The linear programming problem to minimize the total trim loss while meeting the curtain requirements is formulated as above. A basic feasible solution suggests cutting 700 pieces into 5-foot lengths, 400 pieces into 9-foot lengths, and 300 pieces into 7-foot lengths, resulting in a total trim loss of 14,600 feet.
2.(a) मान लीजिए G,nG, n समूहांक का परिमित चक्रीय समूह है। तब सिद्ध कीजिए कि GG के phi(n)\phi(n) जनक हैं (जहाँ पर phi\phi ऑयलर phi\phi-फलन है) ।
Let GG be a finite cyclic group of order nn. Then prove that GG has phi(n)\phi(n) generators (where phi\phi is Euler’s phi\phi-function).
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to prove that a finite cyclic group GG of order nn has phi(n)\phi(n) generators, where phi\phi is Euler’s phi\phi-function. Euler’s phi\phi-function phi(n)\phi(n) is defined as the number of positive integers less than nn that are relatively prime to nn.
Preliminaries
Let GG be a finite cyclic group of order nn generated by aa. That is, G={a^(0),a^(1),a^(2),dots,a^(n-1)}G = \{ a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{n-1} \}.
Generators of GG
A generator gg of GG is an element such that every element in GG can be written as a power of gg. In other words, G={g^(0),g^(1),g^(2),dots,g^(n-1)}G = \{ g^0, g^1, g^2, \ldots, g^{n-1} \}.
Euler’s phi\phi-Function
Euler’s phi\phi-function phi(n)\phi(n) counts the number of positive integers less than nn that are relatively prime to nn.
Proof
Claim: An element a^(k)a^k generates GG if and only if gcd(k,n)=1\gcd(k, n) = 1.
Proof of Claim:
Forward Direction: Suppose a^(k)a^k generates GG. Then (:a^(k):)=G\langle a^k \rangle = G, which means a^(k)a^k has order nn. By Lagrange’s theorem, the order of a^(k)a^k must divide nn. Since a^(k)a^k has order nn, kk and nn must be relatively prime.
Backward Direction: Suppose gcd(k,n)=1\gcd(k, n) = 1. We want to show that a^(k)a^k generates GG. To do this, we need to show that every element a^(m)a^m in GG can be written as (a^(k))^(r)(a^k)^r for some integer rr.
Since gcd(k,n)=1\gcd(k, n) = 1, there exist integers pp and qq such that pk+qn=1pk + qn = 1. For any a^(m)a^m in GG, we have:
where r=mpr = mp. This shows that a^(k)a^k generates GG.
Counting Generators: The number of generators of GG is the same as the number of integers kk such that 0 < k < n0 < k < n and gcd(k,n)=1\gcd(k, n) = 1. This is precisely phi(n)\phi(n).
Conclusion
We have proven that a finite cyclic group GG of order nn has phi(n)\phi(n) generators. The proof relies on the properties of Euler’s phi\phi-function and the definition of a cyclic group.
2.(b) सिद्ध कीजिए कि फलन f(x)=sin x^(2)f(x)=\sin x^2 अंतराल [0,oo[0, \infty [ पर एकसमान संतत नहीं है।
Prove that the function f(x)=sin x^(2)f(x)=\sin x^2 is not uniformly continuous on the interval [0,oo[[0, \infty[.
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to prove that the function f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) is not uniformly continuous on the interval [0,oo)[0, \infty).
Definition of Uniform Continuity
A function f(x)f(x) is said to be uniformly continuous on an interval II if for every epsilon > 0\epsilon > 0, there exists a delta > 0\delta > 0 such that for all x,yx, y in II, if |x-y| < delta|x – y| < \delta, then |f(x)-f(y)| < epsilon|f(x) – f(y)| < \epsilon.
Proof by Contradiction
To prove that f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) is not uniformly continuous on [0,oo)[0, \infty), we’ll use a proof by contradiction. Assume that f(x)f(x) is uniformly continuous on [0,oo)[0, \infty).
Assumption: Assume f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) is uniformly continuous on [0,oo)[0, \infty).
Choose epsilon\epsilon: Let epsilon=(1)/(2)\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}.
Find delta\delta: According to the definition of uniform continuity, there must exist a delta > 0\delta > 0 such that for all x,yx, y in [0,oo)[0, \infty), if |x-y| < delta|x – y| < \delta, then |sin(x^(2))-sin(y^(2))| < (1)/(2)|\sin(x^2) – \sin(y^2)| < \frac{1}{2}.
Construct Counterexample: Consider the sequence x_(n)=sqrt(n pi)x_n = \sqrt{n\pi} and y_(n)=sqrt((n+1)pi)y_n = \sqrt{(n+1)\pi}. We have:
As nn approaches infinity, |x_(n)-y_(n)||x_n – y_n| approaches 0, which means for sufficiently large nn, |x_(n)-y_(n)| < delta|x_n – y_n| < \delta.
Evaluate f(x_(n))-f(y_(n))f(x_n) – f(y_n): We have f(x_(n))=sin(n pi)=0f(x_n) = \sin(n\pi) = 0 and f(y_(n))=sin((n+1)pi)=0f(y_n) = \sin((n+1)\pi) = 0. Therefore, |f(x_(n))-f(y_(n))|=0|f(x_n) – f(y_n)| = 0.
Contradiction: The function f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) oscillates infinitely many times as xx approaches infinity. This means that for any delta > 0\delta > 0, we can find points x,yx, y such that |x-y| < delta|x – y| < \delta but |sin(x^(2))-sin(y^(2))||\sin(x^2) – \sin(y^2)| is close to 1, contradicting the assumption that f(x)f(x) is uniformly continuous.
Conclusion
We have shown that assuming f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) is uniformly continuous leads to a contradiction. Therefore, f(x)=sin(x^(2))f(x) = \sin(x^2) is not uniformly continuous on the interval [0,oo)[0, \infty).
2.(c) कन्टूर समाकलन का उपयोग कर, समाकल int_(0)^(2pi)(1)/(3+2sin theta)d theta\int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{1}{3+2 \sin \theta} d \theta का मान ज्ञात कीजिए ।
Using contour integration, evaluate the integral int_(0)^(2pi)(1)/(3+2sin theta)d theta\int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{1}{3+2 \sin \theta} d \theta.
Answer:
Introduction:
Using contour integration, evaluate the integral
int_(0)^(2pi)(1)/(3+2sin theta)d theta.\int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{1}{3+2 \sin \theta} d \theta.
(a) मान लीजिए R,p( > 0)R, p(>0) अभिलक्षण का एक परिमित क्षेत्र है । दर्शाइए कि f(a)=a^(p),AA a in Rf(a)=a^p, \forall a \in R द्वारा परिभाषित प्रतिचित्रण f:R rarr Rf: R \rightarrow R एकैक समाकारी है ।
Let RR be a finite field of characteristic p( > 0)p(>0). Show that the mapping f:R rarr Rf: R \rightarrow R defined by f(a)=a^(p),AA a in Rf(a)=a^p, \forall a \in R is an isomorphism.
Answer:
Introduction
The problem asks us to prove that the mapping f:R rarr Rf: R \rightarrow R defined by f(a)=a^(p)f(a) = a^p for all a in Ra \in R is an isomorphism, where RR is a finite field of characteristic p > 0p > 0.
Definitions
Field: A set RR with two operations ++ and xx\times that satisfy the field axioms.
Characteristic: A field RR has characteristic pp if pp is the smallest positive integer such that p*a=0p \cdot a = 0 for all a in Ra \in R. If no such pp exists, the characteristic is zero.
Isomorphism: A bijective map f:R rarr Rf: R \rightarrow R that preserves the field operations.
Properties Needed
Frobenius Endomorphism: In a field of characteristic pp, (a+b)^(p)=a^(p)+b^(p)(a+b)^p = a^p + b^p and (ab)^(p)=a^(p)b^(p)(ab)^p = a^p b^p.
Proof
To prove that ff is an isomorphism, we need to show that ff is a bijective map that preserves addition and multiplication.
Suppose f(a)=f(b)f(a) = f(b). Then a^(p)=b^(p)a^p = b^p which implies a^(p)-b^(p)=0a^p – b^p = 0. Since RR is a field, it has no zero divisors, and we can factor a^(p)-b^(p)a^p – b^p as (a-b)^(p)(a-b)^p. This means a-b=0a-b = 0 or a=ba = b, proving that ff is injective.
3. ff is Surjective (Onto)
Since RR is finite and ff is injective, ff must also be surjective. Alternatively, for any b in Rb \in R, b=b^(p^(2))b = b^{p^2} (by Fermat’s Little Theorem or the fact that R^(**)R^*, the multiplicative group of RR, has order p^(n)-1p^n – 1). Thus, f(b^(p-1))=(b^(p-1))^(p)=b^(p)=bf(b^{p-1}) = (b^{p-1})^p = b^p = b, showing that ff is surjective.
Conclusion
We have shown that ff preserves both addition and multiplication, and is both injective and surjective. Therefore, f:R rarr Rf: R \rightarrow R defined by f(a)=a^(p)f(a) = a^p is an isomorphism.
3.(b) एकधा विधि के द्वारा निम्नलिखित रैखिक प्रोग्रामन समस्या को हल कीजिए :
न्यूनतमीकरण कीजिए z=-6X_(1)-2X_(2)-5X_(3)z=-6 X_1-2 X_2-5 X_3
बशर्ते कि
The given Linear Programming Problem (LPP) aims to minimize the objective function z=-6X_(1)-2X_(2)-5X_(3)z = -6X_1 – 2X_2 – 5X_3 subject to certain constraints and variable bounds. The problem is transformed to a standard form by introducing slack variables and then solved using the Simplex method.
Problem Transformation
Let x_(1)+2=X_(1),x_(2)+1=X_(2)x_1+2=X_1, x_2+1=X_2 and x_(3)+1=X_(3)x_3+1=X_3
Negative minimum C_(j)-Z_(j)C_j-Z_j is -6 and its column index is 1 . So, the entering variable is x_(1)x_1.
Minimum ratio is 5 and its row index is 1 . So, the leaving basis variable is S_(1)S_1. :.\therefore The pivot element is 2 .
Entering =x_(1)=x_1, Departing =S_(1)=S_1, Key Element =2=2
{:[R_(1)(” new “)=R_(1)(” old “)-:2],[R_(2)(” new “)=R_(2)(” old “)+4R_(1)(” new “)],[{:R_(3)” (new “)=R_(3)” (old “)-2R_(1)(” new “)]:}\begin{aligned}
& R_1(\text { new })=R_1(\text { old }) \div 2 \\
& R_2(\text { new })=R_2(\text { old })+4 R_1(\text { new }) \\
& \left.\left.R_3 \text { (new }\right)=R_3 \text { (old }\right)-2 R_1(\text { new })
\end{aligned}
Negative minimum C_(j)-Z_(j)C_j-Z_j is -11 and its column index is 2 . So, the entering variable is x_(2)x_2.
Minimum ratio is 6.6 and its row index is 3 . So, the leaving basis variable is S_(3)S_3. :.\therefore The pivot element is 5 .
Entering =x_(2)=x_2, Departing =S_(3)=S_3, Key Element =5=5
{:[R_(3)(” new “)=R_(3)(” old “)-:5],[{:R_(1)(” new “)=R_(1)(” old “)+1.5R_(3)” (new “)],[R_(2)(” new “)=R_(2)(” old “)+2R_(3)(” new “)]:}\begin{aligned}
& R_3(\text { new })=R_3(\text { old }) \div 5 \\
& \left.R_1(\text { new })=R_1(\text { old })+1.5 R_3 \text { (new }\right) \\
& R_2(\text { new })=R_2(\text { old })+2 R_3(\text { new })
\end{aligned}
Negative minimum C_(j)-Z_(j)C_j-Z_j is -13 and its column index is 3 . So, the entering variable is x_(3)x_3.
Minimum ratio is 5.32 and its row index is 2 . So, the leaving basis variable is S_(2)S_2. :.\therefore The pivot element is 10 .
Entering =x_(3)=x_3, Departing =S_(2)=S_2, Key Element =10=10
{:[R_(2)(” new “)=R_(2)(” old “)-:10],[R_(1)(” new “)=R_(1)(” old “)+R_(2)(” new “)],[R_(3)(” new “)=R_(3)(” old “)+R_(2)(” new “)]:}\begin{aligned}
& R_2(\text { new })=R_2(\text { old }) \div 10 \\
& R_1(\text { new })=R_1(\text { old })+R_2(\text { new }) \\
& R_3(\text { new })=R_3(\text { old })+R_2(\text { new })
\end{aligned}
Hence, Min Z=MinZ^(**)-29\operatorname{Min} Z=\operatorname{Min} Z^*-29
Min Z=-171.76-29=-200.76\operatorname{Min} Z=-171.76-29=-200.76
Conclusion
The optimal solution to the given LPP is x_(1)=20.22,x_(2)=11.92,x_(3)=5.32x_1 = 20.22, x_2 = 11.92, x_3 = 5.32 with a minimum value of Z=-200.76Z = -200.76. All C_(j)-Z_(j)C_j – Z_j values are non-negative, confirming that the solution is optimal.
3.(c) यदि u=tan^(-1)((x^(3)+y^(3))/(x-y)),x!=yu=\tan ^{-1} \frac{x^3+y^3}{x-y}, x \neq y
तब दर्शाइए कि x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))=(1-4sin^(2)u)sin 2ux^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+2 x y \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y}+y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=\left(1-4 \sin ^2 u\right) \sin 2 u
If u=tan^(-1)((x^(3)+y^(3))/(x-y)),x!=yu=\tan ^{-1} \frac{x^3+y^3}{x-y}, x \neq y
then show that x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))=(1-4sin^(2)u)sin 2ux^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+2 x y \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y}+y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=\left(1-4 \sin ^2 u\right) \sin 2 u
Answer:
Introduction:
Here, we explore the nature of a function u=tan^(-1)((x^(3)+y^(3))/(x-y))u = \tan^{-1}\frac{x^3+y^3}{x-y} and investigate its homogeneity.
Homogeneity of uu:
We start by considering whether uu is a homogeneous function.
However, we express tan u=(x^(3)+y^(3))/(x-y)\tan u = \frac{x^3+y^3}{x-y} as zz, where zz is a new variable. Thus, we obtain:
{:[tan u=(x^(3)+y^(3))/(x-y)=z quad rarr(1)],[=>z=x^(2)[(1+((y)/(x))^(3))/(1-((y)/(x)))]]:}\begin{aligned}
& \tan u = \frac{x^3+y^3}{x-y} = z \quad \rightarrow(1) \\
& \Rightarrow z = x^2\left[\frac{1+\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)^3}{1-\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}\right]
\end{aligned}
Now, zz is shown to be a homogeneous function of xx and yy of degree 2:
Derivatives of zz and uu:
Next, we calculate the derivatives of zz and uu with respect to xx and yy. These derivatives play a crucial role in our analysis. From equation (1), we have:
From the derivatives in equation (3), we further derive:
{:[(del^(2)z)/(delx^(2))=sec^(2)u(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2sec^(2)u tan u((del u)/(del x))^(2)],[(del^(2)z)/(dely^(2))=sec^(2)u(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))+2sec^(2)u tan u((del u)/(del y))^(2)]:}\begin{aligned}
& \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2} = \sec^2 u \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + 2 \sec^2 u \tan u \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)^2 \\
& \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2} = \sec^2 u \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} + 2 \sec^2 u \tan u \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)^2
\end{aligned}
And the mixed partial derivative:
(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)=sec^(2)u(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+2sec^(2)u tan u(del u)/(del x)(del u)/(del y)\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} = \sec^2 u \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y} + 2 \sec^2 u \tan u \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}
Euler’s Theorem and Further Simplification:
By a corollary of Euler’s theorem, we reach the following relationships:
{:[x^(2)(del^(2)z)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)z)/(dely^(2))=2(2-1)z],[=>sec^(2)u(x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2)))+2sec^(2)u tan u[x^(2)((del u)/(del x))^(2)+2xy(del u)/(del x)(del u)/(del y)+y^(2)((del u)/(del y))^(2)]=2tan u]:}\begin{aligned}
& x^2 \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2} + 2xy \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2} = 2(2-1)z \\
& \Rightarrow \sec^2 u \left(x^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + 2xy \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}\right) + 2 \sec^2 u \tan u \left[x^2\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)^2+2xy \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}+y^2\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)^2\right] = 2 \tan u
\end{aligned}
divide by sec^(2)usec^2 u
{:[=>x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))+2tan u(x(del u)/(del x)+y(del u)/(del y))^(2)=2sin u cos u],[=>x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))=sin 2u-2tan usin^(2)2u(by(4))],[=(1-4sin^(2)u)sin 2u]:}\begin{aligned}
& \Rightarrow x^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+2 x y \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y}+y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}+2 \tan u\left(x \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+y \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)^2=2 \sin u \cos u \\
& \Rightarrow x^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+2 x y \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y}+y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=\sin 2u-2 \tan u \sin ^2 2u(b y(4)) \\
& =\left(1-4 \sin ^2 u\right) \sin 2 u
\end{aligned}
Final Relationship:
Finally, we obtain:
x^(2)(del^(2)u)/(delx^(2))+2xy(del^(2)u)/(del x del y)+y^(2)(del^(2)u)/(dely^(2))=(1-4sin^(2)u)sin 2ux^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + 2xy \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} =\left(1-4 \sin ^2 u\right) \sin 2 u
This equation represents a significant relationship in our analysis.
4.(a) यदि v(r,theta)=(r-(1)/(r))sin theta,r!=0v(r, \theta)=\left(r-\frac{1}{r}\right) \sin \theta, r \neq 0,
तब विश्लेषिक फलन f(z)=u(r,theta)+iv(r,theta)f(z)=u(r, \theta)+i v(r, \theta) ज्ञात कीजिए ।
If v(r,theta)=(r-(1)/(r))sin theta,r!=0v(r, \theta)=\left(r-\frac{1}{r}\right) \sin \theta, r \neq 0,
then find an analytic function f(z)=u(r,theta)+iv(r,theta)f(z)=u(r, \theta)+i v(r, \theta)
Answer:
Introduction:
The problem involves finding an analytic function f(z)f(z) given a complex-valued function v(r,theta)v(r, \theta) in polar coordinates.
Solution:
Step 1: Cauchy-Riemann Equations in Polar Coordinates
The Cauchy-Riemann equations in polar coordinates are as follows:
Step 2: Expressions for Partial Derivatives of vv
From the given function v(r,theta)v(r, \theta), we have the following expressions for the partial derivatives:
Step 2: Apply Property of Definite Integrals
By using the property int_(0)^(a)f(x)=int_(0)^(a)f(a-x)\int_0^a f(x) = \int_0^a f(a-x), we can rewrite the integral as follows:
Conclusion:
The integral int_(0)^(pi//2)(sin^(2)x)/(sin x+cos x)dx\int_0^{\pi / 2} \frac{\sin^2 x}{\sin x + \cos x} dx is equal to (1)/(sqrt2)ln(1+sqrt2)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \ln(1+\sqrt{2}), as shown.
(c) वोगेल की सम्निकटन विधि से निम्नलिखित परिवहन समस्या का आरंभिक आधारिक सुसंगत हल ज्ञात कीजिए । इस हल का उपयोग कर समस्या का इष्टतम हल एवं परिवहन लागत ज्ञात कीजिए ।
Find the initial basic feasible solution of the following transportation problem by Vogel’s approximation method and use it to find the optimal solution and the transportation cost of the problem.
The minimum total transportation cost =0xx15+8xx5+9xx15+20 xx5+0xx5+18 xx5=365=0 \times 15+8 \times 5+9 \times 15+20 \times 5+0 \times 5+18 \times 5=365
Here, the number of allocated cells =6=6 is equal to m+n-1=3+4-1=6m+n-1=3+4-1=6 :.\therefore This solution is non-degenerate
Optimality test using modi method…
Allocation Table is
Now choose the minimum negative value from all d_(ij)d_{i j} (opportunity cost) =d_(14)=[-1]=d_{14}=[-1] and draw a closed path from S_(1)D_(4)S_1 D_4.
Closed path is S_(1)D_(4)rarrS_(1)D_(2)rarrS_(2)D_(2)rarrS_(2)D_(4)S_1 D_4 \rightarrow S_1 D_2 \rightarrow S_2 D_2 \rightarrow S_2 D_4
Closed path and plus/minus sign allocation…
” The minimum total transportation cost “=0xx10+11 xx5+8xx10+9xx15+0xx5+18 xx5=360\text { The minimum total transportation cost }=0 \times 10+11 \times 5+8 \times 10+9 \times 15+0 \times 5+18 \times 5=360
खण्ड ‘B’ SECTION ‘B’
5.(a) z=yf(x)+xg(y)z=y f(x)+x g(y) से स्वैच्छिक फलनों f(x)f(x) व g(y)g(y) का विलोपन कर आंशिक अवकल समीकरण बनाइए तथा इसकी प्रकृति (दीर्घवृत्तीय, अतिपरवलीय या परवलीय) x > 0,y > 0x>0, y>0 क्षेत्र में इंगित कीजिए ।
Form a partial differential equation by eliminating the arbitrary functions f(x)f(x) and g(y)g(y) from z=yf(x)+xg(y)z=y f(x)+x g(y) and specify its nature (elliptic, hyperbolic or parabolic) in the region x > 0,y > 0x>0, y>0.
Answer:
Introduction:
The problem requires forming a partial differential equation by eliminating the arbitrary functions f(x)f(x) and g(y)g(y) from the given equation z=yf(x)+xg(y)z=yf(x)+xg(y). Additionally, it asks for specifying the nature of this equation in the region x > 0,y > 0x>0, y>0.
Step 5: Substituting into Equation (4)
Substituting the expressions for f^(‘)(x)f'(x) and g^(‘)(y)g'(y) into equation (4), we obtain:
{:[(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)=(1)/(y)((del z)/(del x)-g(y))+(1)/(x)((del z)/(del y)-f(x))],[=>xy(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)=x(del z)/(del x)+y(del z)/(del y)-{xg(y)+yf(x)}],[=>xy(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)=x(del z)/(del x)+y(del z)/(del y)-z],[xy(del^(2)z)/(del x del y)-x(del z)/(del x)-y(del z)/(del y)+z=0]:}\begin{aligned}
&\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{1}{y}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} – g(y)\right) + \frac{1}{x}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} – f(x)\right) \\
&\Rightarrow x y \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} = x \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + y \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} – \{xg(y) + yf(x)\} \\
&\Rightarrow x y \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} = x \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + y \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} – z \\
& x y \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} – x \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} – y \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} + z = 0
\end{aligned}
Step 6: Compare with General Form
Comparing the obtained equation with the general form R_(r)+S_(s)+T_(t)+f(x,y,z)=0R_r + S_s + T_t + f(x, y, z) = 0, we have:
{:[R=0],[S=xy],[T=0]:}\begin{aligned}
R &= 0 \\
S &= xy \\
T &= 0
\end{aligned}
Step 7: Nature of the Equation
The discriminant of the equation is given by S^(2)-4RT=x^(2)y^(2) > 0S^2 – 4RT = x^2y^2 > 0, indicating that it is a hyperbolic partial differential equation.
Conclusion:
The partial differential equation obtained from eliminating the arbitrary functions f(x)f(x) and g(y)g(y) from z=yf(x)+xg(y)z=yf(x)+xg(y) is hyperbolic in the region x > 0,y > 0x>0, y>0.
5.(b) दर्शाइए कि समीकरण : f(x)=cos((pi(x+1))/(8))+0*148 x-0*9062=0f(x)=\cos \frac{\pi(x+1)}{8}+0 \cdot 148 x-0 \cdot 9062=0
का एक मूल अन्तराल (-1,0)(-1,0) में तथा एक मूल (0,1)(0,1) में है । ऋणात्मक मूल की न्यूटन-रॉफसन विधि से दशमलव के चार स्थान तक सही गणना कीजिए।
Show that the equation: f(x)=cos((pi(x+1))/(8))+0*148 x-0*9062=0f(x)=\cos \frac{\pi(x+1)}{8}+0 \cdot 148 x-0 \cdot 9062=0
has one root in the interval (-1,0)(-1,0) and one in (0,1)(0,1). Calculate the negative root correct to four decimal places using Newton-Raphson method.
Answer:
Introduction:
The problem involves showing that the equation f(x)=cos((pi(x+1))/(8))+0.148 x-0.9062=0f(x) = \cos \frac{\pi(x+1)}{8} + 0.148x – 0.9062 = 0