Free BHIC-110 Solved Assignment | July 2024 – January 2025 | History of India:1757-1857 | IGNOU

Question Details

Aspect

Details

Programme Title

BACHELOR'S OF ARTS HISTORY HONOURS PROGRAMME (BAHIH)

Course Code

BHIC-110

Course Title

HISTORY OF INDIA-V (c. 1550-1605)

Assignment Code

BHIC110/ASST/TMA/2024-25

University

Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)

Type

Free IGNOU Solved Assignment 

Language

English

Session

July 2024 – January 2025

Submission Date

31st March for July session, 30th September for January session

BHIC-110 Solved Assignment

Assignment-1 Answer in about 5 0 0 5 0 0 500\mathbf{5 0 0}500 words each.
  1. What was the impact of Commercialisation of agriculture? Discuss.20.
  2. Discuss the differences between the Orientalists and the Utilitarians.20.
Assignment-2 Answer in about 2 5 0 2 5 0 250\mathbf{2 5 0}250 words each.
3. Did the Permanent Settlement succeed in its objectives?Discuss.10.
4. What is deindustrialization? Comment in the colonial context.10.
5. What were the causes of the Revolt of 1857?Discuss.10.
Assignment-3 Answer in about 100 words each.
6. The rise of novel
7. Mahalwari Settlement
8. Rule of Law
9. City and countryside in the 19 th 19 th 19^(“th “)19^{\text {th }}19th century
10. The beginnings of the indentured labour

Expert Answer

Assignment-1

Answer in about 500 words each.

Question:-1

What was the impact of Commercialisation of agriculture? Discuss.

Answer:

1. Introduction
The commercialization of agriculture refers to the shift from subsistence farming to the production of crops for sale in the market. This transformation has profound implications for the economy, society, and environment. The phenomenon, which gained momentum during the British colonial period in India, altered traditional agricultural practices and had far-reaching impacts on various aspects of rural and urban life.
2. Economic Impact
Increased Agricultural Production: Commercialization led to an increase in agricultural production as farmers began cultivating cash crops like cotton, indigo, tea, and jute instead of traditional food grains. This shift was driven by market demand and the prospect of higher profits.
Market Integration: The integration of local markets with national and international markets became more pronounced. Farmers started producing crops that were in demand globally, thereby linking rural economies to global trade networks.
Monetization of Rural Economy: The shift from barter to a cash economy was a significant outcome of commercialization. Farmers began to receive cash payments for their produce, which facilitated the monetization of rural economies and spurred economic activities beyond agriculture.
Development of Infrastructure: To support the commercialization process, the British colonial administration invested in the development of infrastructure such as railways, roads, and irrigation systems. This infrastructure development facilitated the movement of goods to markets and ports.
3. Social Impact
Changes in Land Tenure and Ownership: Commercialization altered traditional land tenure systems. Land ownership became more concentrated as wealthy farmers and landlords acquired more land, often at the expense of smallholders and tenants.
Shift in Labor Dynamics: There was a significant shift in labor dynamics with the rise of wage labor. Many small farmers and landless laborers began working on larger farms or plantations for wages, leading to a decline in subsistence farming.
Social Stratification: The commercialization of agriculture exacerbated social stratification. Wealthy landowners benefited from the new system, while small farmers and laborers often faced exploitation and impoverishment. This widening economic disparity led to increased social tensions.
Impact on Traditional Practices: Traditional agricultural practices and rural lifestyles were disrupted. The emphasis on cash crops reduced the cultivation of food grains, affecting local food security and traditional diets.
4. Environmental Impact
Changes in Crop Patterns: The focus on cash crops led to significant changes in crop patterns. Monoculture became prevalent, which had implications for soil health and biodiversity. The cultivation of the same crop year after year led to soil depletion and increased vulnerability to pests and diseases.
Deforestation and Land Degradation: To expand agricultural lands for cash crops, extensive deforestation occurred, leading to loss of forest cover and biodiversity. This deforestation also contributed to soil erosion and degradation of land quality.
Increased Use of Chemical Inputs: The commercialization process saw an increase in the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides to boost crop yields. While this initially led to higher productivity, it also caused long-term environmental damage, including soil pollution and contamination of water resources.
Water Resource Strain: The cultivation of water-intensive cash crops like sugarcane and cotton strained water resources, leading to depletion of groundwater levels and reduced availability of water for other uses.
5. Technological Impact
Adoption of New Techniques: Commercialization encouraged the adoption of new agricultural techniques and technologies. This included the use of improved seed varieties, mechanization, and irrigation methods, which enhanced productivity.
Innovation and Research: There was a greater emphasis on agricultural research and innovation to develop high-yielding crop varieties and efficient farming practices. Agricultural universities and research institutions played a crucial role in this development.
6. Impact on Rural-Urban Dynamics
Rural to Urban Migration: The commercialization of agriculture spurred rural to urban migration as displaced farmers and laborers moved to cities in search of employment opportunities. This migration contributed to the growth of urban centers and altered demographic patterns.
Urbanization: Increased agricultural production and market integration supported the growth of urban markets and industries. Cities expanded as centers of trade, processing, and distribution of agricultural products, fostering urbanization.
7. Impact on Food Security
Decline in Food Grain Production: The emphasis on cash crops often came at the expense of food grain production, leading to concerns about food security. Many regions faced shortages of staple foods, making them reliant on food imports.
Price Volatility: Commercial agriculture exposed farmers to market price volatility. Fluctuations in global commodity prices could lead to unpredictable incomes for farmers, affecting their economic stability and food security.
8. Policy Implications
Agricultural Policies: Governments were prompted to develop policies to support commercial agriculture, including subsidies for inputs, credit facilities, and marketing support. These policies aimed to boost productivity and ensure stable incomes for farmers.
Land Reforms: In some regions, commercialization highlighted the need for land reforms to address issues of land concentration and inequitable distribution. Land reforms aimed to redistribute land to smallholders and improve their access to resources.
Support Systems: The development of cooperatives and farmer organizations provided support systems for small and marginal farmers. These organizations helped in collective bargaining, access to credit, and sharing of resources and knowledge.
9. Global Trade Impact
Export Growth: The commercialization of agriculture contributed to the growth of agricultural exports. Countries specializing in certain cash crops found new markets abroad, which boosted foreign exchange earnings.
Dependency on Global Markets: However, this also made local economies vulnerable to global market fluctuations. Dependency on exports meant that any changes in international demand or prices could have significant repercussions on the domestic agricultural sector.
10. Long-Term Socio-Economic Changes
Economic Diversification: In the long term, commercialization led to economic diversification. Regions that initially focused on agriculture gradually developed other economic activities such as agro-processing, manufacturing, and services.
Rural Development: Infrastructure development, increased cash flow, and market integration contributed to overall rural development. Improved access to education, healthcare, and social services followed the economic upliftment brought about by commercial agriculture.
Conclusion
The commercialization of agriculture has had profound and multifaceted impacts on economies, societies, and environments. While it has driven economic growth, increased productivity, and market integration, it has also led to social disparities, environmental degradation, and challenges to food security. Understanding these impacts is crucial for formulating policies that balance economic benefits with social equity and environmental sustainability. The legacy of agricultural commercialization continues to shape rural and urban dynamics, influencing the development trajectories of many countries.

Question:-2

Discuss the differences between the Orientalists and the Utilitarians.

Answer:

1. Introduction
The Orientalists and the Utilitarians were two influential schools of thought during the British colonial period in India. Each had distinct perspectives on the governance, culture, and education of India. Their contrasting views significantly influenced colonial policies and the development of modern Indian society. This discussion explores the core differences between these two groups, focusing on their philosophies, approaches to education, cultural attitudes, and administrative policies.
2. Philosophical Foundations
Orientalists: The Orientalists were scholars and administrators who believed in understanding and preserving the rich cultural and historical heritage of India. They advocated for the study of classical Indian languages like Sanskrit, Persian, and Arabic, as well as the traditional literature and sciences of India. Their approach was rooted in a respect for the ancient civilizations of the East and a belief that the wisdom of these cultures could contribute to global knowledge.
Utilitarians: The Utilitarians, influenced by the ideas of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill, emphasized practical and measurable outcomes. They believed in the principle of the greatest good for the greatest number and sought to apply rational, scientific principles to governance. Their focus was on efficiency, modernization, and the application of Western scientific and legal principles to improve society.
3. Approach to Education
Orientalists: Orientalists advocated for the promotion of traditional Indian education. They supported the establishment of institutions like the Calcutta Madrasa (1781) and the Benares Sanskrit College (1791) to preserve and teach Indian classical knowledge. They believed that education in vernacular and classical languages was essential for understanding and administering the country effectively.
Utilitarians: Utilitarians, on the other hand, argued for the introduction of Western education and English as the medium of instruction. They believed that Western knowledge and sciences were superior and necessary for progress. Thomas Babington Macaulay’s Minute on Education (1835) epitomized this view, advocating for an education system that would produce "a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect."
4. Cultural Attitudes
Orientalists: Orientalists had a deep appreciation for Indian culture, literature, and traditions. They believed that India’s ancient texts and philosophies had significant value and should be studied and preserved. This respect for Indian culture often led them to adopt a more sympathetic and accommodating attitude towards Indian customs and social structures.
Utilitarians: Utilitarians viewed Indian society as backward and in need of reform. They were critical of traditional Indian practices and institutions, which they often saw as irrational and oppressive. Utilitarians promoted the introduction of Western legal, political, and social systems as a means to civilize and modernize India.
5. Administrative Policies
Orientalists: In terms of governance, Orientalists supported a policy of gradual reform and adaptation. They believed in working within the existing Indian social and political structures to bring about change. This approach often involved collaborating with Indian elites and respecting local customs and laws.
Utilitarians: Utilitarians advocated for more direct and radical reforms. They supported the imposition of British legal and administrative systems, believing that this would lead to more efficient and just governance. Utilitarians were instrumental in implementing reforms such as the abolition of Sati and the introduction of Western-style legal codes.
6. Impact on Indian Society
Orientalists: The Orientalist approach helped preserve a significant body of Indian literature, philosophy, and historical texts. Their work laid the foundation for the academic study of Indology and contributed to a deeper understanding of India’s cultural heritage. This preservation also fostered a sense of pride and continuity among Indians regarding their ancient traditions.
Utilitarians: Utilitarian policies had a profound impact on modernizing Indian society. The introduction of Western education, legal systems, and administrative practices brought significant changes to Indian social structures. These reforms often disrupted traditional ways of life but also laid the groundwork for modern institutions and governance.
7. Key Figures
Orientalists: Key figures among the Orientalists included Sir William Jones, who founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal, and Henry Thomas Colebrooke, a pioneering Sanskrit scholar. These individuals dedicated their careers to studying and promoting Indian languages, literature, and history.
Utilitarians: Prominent Utilitarians included James Mill, who wrote "The History of British India," and Thomas Babington Macaulay, whose educational policies reshaped Indian education. Their writings and policies significantly influenced British administrative and educational reforms in India.
8. Influence on Colonial Policy
Orientalists: The Orientalist approach influenced early colonial policies that emphasized respect for Indian traditions and gradual reform. This approach helped in gaining the cooperation of Indian elites and maintaining social stability during the initial phases of British rule.
Utilitarians: The Utilitarian influence became more pronounced in the mid-19th century, leading to more assertive and interventionist policies. The emphasis on Westernization and modernization marked a shift in colonial strategy, reflecting a belief in the superiority of Western civilization and the need to transform Indian society accordingly.
9. Legacy
Orientalists: The legacy of the Orientalists is seen in the continued study and appreciation of India’s classical heritage. Their efforts preserved invaluable texts and knowledge, contributing to the field of Indology and fostering a sense of cultural identity among Indians.
Utilitarians: The Utilitarian legacy is evident in the modern institutions and systems introduced during the colonial period. The foundations of contemporary Indian education, legal systems, and administrative practices can be traced back to Utilitarian reforms, which aimed to integrate India into a globalized, modern framework.
Conclusion
The Orientalists and the Utilitarians represented two distinct approaches to colonial governance and cultural interaction in India. While the Orientalists sought to preserve and respect Indian traditions, the Utilitarians aimed to reform and modernize Indian society based on Western principles. Both groups left lasting legacies that continue to shape India’s cultural and institutional landscape. Understanding these differences provides insight into the complexities of colonial policy and its long-term impacts on Indian society.

Assignment-2

Answer in about 250 words each.

Question:-3

Did the Permanent Settlement succeed in its objectives? Discuss.

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement, introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793, was a land revenue system implemented in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa during British rule in India. It aimed to create a stable and efficient revenue collection mechanism by fixing land revenue permanently, thus ensuring a steady income for the British administration. While it had certain successes, it largely failed to achieve its intended objectives.
Successes:
Stable Revenue for the British: One of the primary successes of the Permanent Settlement was that it provided the British administration with a stable and predictable revenue source. By fixing the revenue demand permanently, the British could plan their finances with greater certainty.
Creation of a Landed Aristocracy: The policy led to the emergence of a class of loyal landlords (Zamindars) who were expected to support British interests. These Zamindars were given ownership rights over their land, which they could inherit and transfer, creating a stable landowning class.
Initial Boost in Agricultural Production: Initially, the certainty of fixed revenue encouraged some Zamindars to invest in agricultural improvements, leading to increased productivity in certain areas.
Failures:
Neglect of Peasants’ Welfare: The Permanent Settlement failed to account for the welfare of the actual cultivators (Ryots). The Zamindars, focused on maximizing their profits, often exploited the peasants, leading to widespread poverty and hardship among the agricultural community.
Revenue Burden on Zamindars: The fixed revenue demand was set at a high level, often leading to financial strain on the Zamindars, especially during years of poor harvests. Many Zamindars defaulted on their payments, leading to the auction of their estates and increasing instability.
Lack of Incentives for Agricultural Development: Over time, the fixed revenue system provided little incentive for Zamindars to invest in land improvements or adopt new agricultural techniques, as any benefits would accrue to the Ryots while the Zamindars’ revenue remained constant.
Economic Stagnation: The lack of investment in agriculture and the heavy burden on peasants led to economic stagnation in many regions. Agricultural productivity did not see significant improvements, and the rural economy suffered as a result.
Conclusion:
While the Permanent Settlement succeeded in providing a stable revenue source for the British and creating a loyal landed aristocracy, it largely failed in promoting agricultural development and improving the welfare of peasants. The system led to economic stagnation, exploitation of cultivators, and instability among Zamindars, ultimately undermining its long-term objectives.

Question:-4

What is deindustrialization? Comment in the colonial context.

Answer:

Deindustrialization refers to the decline of industrial activity in a region or economy, characterized by a reduction in manufacturing jobs, industrial output, and economic dependence on industry. This phenomenon can occur due to various factors, such as technological advancements, globalization, or shifts in economic policy.
Colonial Context:
In the colonial context, deindustrialization often refers to the process by which colonial powers, particularly the British in India, systematically dismantled local industries to serve their economic interests. This deindustrialization was not a natural economic progression but a deliberate policy to transform colonies into suppliers of raw materials and consumers of finished goods from the colonial power.
Impact on India:
Destruction of Traditional Industries: Before British colonization, India had a thriving textile industry, known for its high-quality cotton and silk products. British policies, such as heavy taxation on Indian textiles and the imposition of tariffs that favored British goods, led to the decline of this industry. The British flooded the Indian market with cheap, machine-made textiles from England, making it difficult for Indian artisans to compete.
Shift to Raw Material Production: The colonial administration encouraged the cultivation of cash crops like cotton, indigo, and jute for export to Britain. This shift reduced the emphasis on food crops, leading to agricultural monoculture and increased vulnerability to famines.
Infrastructure for Resource Extraction: British infrastructure projects in India, such as railways and ports, were designed primarily to facilitate the extraction and export of raw materials rather than to support local industrialization. This infrastructure reinforced India’s role as a supplier of raw materials.
Loss of Skills and Livelihoods: Deindustrialization led to the loss of traditional skills and crafts. Artisans and weavers were forced out of their occupations, leading to widespread unemployment and impoverishment. Many were compelled to become agricultural laborers or migrate to urban centers in search of work.
Economic Stagnation: The lack of investment in local industries and the focus on raw material exports resulted in economic stagnation. India’s industrial growth was stunted, and the economy remained largely agrarian and underdeveloped.
Conclusion:
Deindustrialization in the colonial context of India was a deliberate strategy by the British to reshape the Indian economy to suit their interests. This process caused the decline of traditional industries, economic stagnation, and widespread poverty, leaving a lasting impact on India’s economic development. The legacy of colonial deindustrialization is evident in the challenges faced by post-independence India in rebuilding and modernizing its industrial base.

Question:-5

What were the causes of the Revolt of 1857? Discuss.

Answer:

The Revolt of 1857, also known as the First War of Indian Independence, was a significant uprising against British rule in India. It was a result of multiple causes, spanning political, economic, social, and military grievances.
Political Causes:
  • Annexation Policies: The British policy of annexation, particularly the Doctrine of Lapse implemented by Lord Dalhousie, led to the annexation of several Indian states, such as Jhansi and Awadh, causing resentment among the displaced rulers and their supporters.
  • Displacement of Aristocracy: The British administration systematically undermined traditional Indian nobility and rulers, reducing their power and influence, which fueled dissatisfaction among the erstwhile elites.
Economic Causes:
  • Heavy Taxation: The introduction of exploitative revenue systems, such as the Permanent Settlement, burdened the peasants with high taxes, leading to widespread poverty and hardship.
  • Destruction of Local Industries: British policies favoring the import of British goods and the deindustrialization of local crafts and industries caused economic distress among artisans and traders.
Social and Religious Causes:
  • Social Reforms: British social reforms, such as the abolition of Sati and the legalization of widow remarriage, were perceived by many as an interference in their traditional customs and religious practices.
  • Missionary Activities: The activities of Christian missionaries and the British administration’s perceived favoritism towards Christianity created fears among Indians about forced conversions and the erosion of their religious identity.
Military Causes:
  • Sepoy Grievances: Indian soldiers (sepoys) in the British East India Company’s army faced discrimination, low pay, and poor prospects for advancement compared to their British counterparts.
  • Enfield Rifle Incident: The introduction of the new Enfield rifle, which required soldiers to bite off the ends of greased cartridges rumored to be coated with cow and pig fat, offended both Hindu and Muslim religious sensibilities, igniting immediate outrage among the sepoys.
Immediate Cause:
  • Mutiny at Meerut: The revolt began in Meerut on May 10, 1857, when Indian soldiers rebelled against their British officers, leading to a widespread uprising that spread across northern and central India.
Conclusion:
The Revolt of 1857 was a culmination of longstanding grievances against British rule. Political annexations, economic exploitation, social and religious interference, and military discontent collectively fueled the uprising. Though the revolt was eventually suppressed, it marked a significant turning point in Indian history, leading to the end of the East India Company’s rule and the reorganization of British governance in India.

Assignment-3

Answer in about 100 words each.

Question:-6

The rise of novel.

Answer:

The rise of the novel, particularly in the 18th century, marked a significant development in literary history. This period saw the emergence of the novel as a distinct and popular literary form, characterized by its focus on individual experience, realism, and detailed character development.
Early Pioneers: Early novels, such as Daniel Defoe’s "Robinson Crusoe" (1719) and Samuel Richardson’s "Pamela" (1740), laid the groundwork for the genre. These works were notable for their narrative structure, exploration of personal morality, and use of realistic settings and characters.
Social and Cultural Factors: The rise of the middle class and increased literacy rates contributed to the novel’s popularity. The printing press made books more accessible, and the novel’s focus on individualism resonated with contemporary societal changes.
Literary Innovation: Authors like Henry Fielding, with "Tom Jones" (1749), and Jane Austen, with "Pride and Prejudice" (1813), further refined the form, blending social commentary with engaging storytelling.
The novel’s evolution continued into the 19th century, solidifying its place as a central genre in literature.

Question:-7

Mahalwari Settlement.

Answer:

The Mahalwari Settlement, introduced by the British in North-Western Provinces, Punjab, and parts of Central India in the early 19th century, was a land revenue system aimed at maximizing colonial revenue from agriculture.
Key Features:
  • Community-Based Assessment: Unlike the Permanent Settlement (individual landlords) and Ryotwari System (individual farmers), the Mahalwari Settlement involved entire villages (Mahals) as a unit of revenue assessment.
  • Land Ownership: The village community or local landowners collectively held responsibility for paying the land revenue. Each member contributed according to the value of their land.
  • Periodic Revision: Revenue rates were not fixed permanently; they were subject to periodic revisions based on assessments of agricultural productivity.
Impact:
  • Administrative Control: This system aimed to simplify revenue collection and maintain administrative control by working through local structures.
  • Economic Burden: Like other revenue systems, it often led to heavy taxation and economic strain on farmers, contributing to rural indebtedness and discontent.
The Mahalwari Settlement was part of the broader British effort to extract revenue and assert control over rural India.

Question:-8

Rule of Law.

Answer:

The rule of law is a foundational principle that ensures all individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law. It upholds equality, fairness, and justice in society.
Core Principles:
  • Legal Supremacy: The law is supreme, and no one is above it. This means that laws are applied consistently and fairly to all individuals, regardless of status or position.
  • Equality Before the Law: Every individual is treated equally under the law, with equal access to justice and legal remedies.
  • Protection of Rights: The rule of law protects individual rights and liberties, ensuring that laws do not infringe on fundamental freedoms.
Significance:
  • Accountability: It holds government officials and public servants accountable for their actions, preventing abuse of power.
  • Predictability: It provides a predictable legal environment, promoting stability and confidence in legal processes.
The rule of law is essential for maintaining democratic governance, social order, and the protection of human rights.

Question:-9

City and countryside in the 19th century.

Answer:

In the 19th century, the city and countryside exhibited stark contrasts due to industrialization and socio-economic changes.
City Life:
  • Industrial Growth: Cities rapidly expanded as industrial hubs, attracting masses of people seeking employment in factories. Urban areas experienced significant growth in population and infrastructure.
  • Living Conditions: While cities offered economic opportunities, they also faced challenges like overcrowding, poor sanitation, and inadequate housing. The urban working class often lived in cramped, unhealthy conditions.
Countryside Life:
  • Agricultural Economy: The countryside remained predominantly agrarian, with life centered around farming and rural communities. Traditional ways of life persisted, but there was increasing pressure from economic and social changes.
  • Rural-Urban Migration: Economic hardship and the promise of better opportunities led many rural inhabitants to migrate to cities, altering the demographic and economic landscape.
The 19th century saw a dynamic interplay between urban growth and rural transformation, setting the stage for modern socio-economic development.

Question:-10

The beginnings of the indentured labour.

Answer:

The beginnings of indentured labor can be traced to the early 19th century as a solution to labor shortages in European colonies following the abolition of slavery. This system involved binding laborers under contracts (indentures) to work for a specific period, usually five to seven years, in exchange for passage, accommodation, and wages.
Key Features:
  • Origins: The system began in the 1830s, with Britain recruiting laborers from India, China, and other regions to work in plantations in the Caribbean, Mauritius, Fiji, and Africa.
  • Conditions: Indentured laborers often faced harsh working and living conditions, with limited freedoms and rights, similar to the conditions experienced by former slaves.
Impact:
  • Global Migration: This system led to significant global migration, creating diverse, multicultural societies in the colonies.
  • Legacy: The indentured labor system had lasting social and cultural impacts, contributing to the diaspora of Indian and Chinese communities worldwide.
The system marked a pivotal chapter in labor history, reflecting both exploitation and the beginnings of global labor mobility.

Search Free Solved Assignment

Just Type atleast 3 letters of your Paper Code

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top