Question Details
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Programme Title |
BACHELOR OF ARTS (BASOH) |
|
Course Code |
BSOC-102 |
|
Course Title |
SOCIOLOGY OF INDIA- I |
|
Assignment Code |
BSOC-102 |
|
University |
Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) |
|
Type |
Free IGNOU Solved Assignment |
|
Language |
English |
|
Session |
July 2023 – January 2024 |
|
Submission Date |
31st March for July session, 30th September for January session |
BSOC-102 Solved Assignment
Assignment A
Ans wer the following in about 500 words each.
- Describe the nature and history of emergence of sociology in India.
- Discuss the agrarian class structure in India with examples.
Assignment B
Ans wer the following questions in about 250 words each.
3. Compare the administrative perspective with that of the Orientalist and the Indologists.
4. Who are the subalterns? Discuss one of the sublatern movements in India.
5. Describe the features and types of industries in India.
3. Compare the administrative perspective with that of the Orientalist and the Indologists.
4. Who are the subalterns? Discuss one of the sublatern movements in India.
5. Describe the features and types of industries in India.
Assignment C
Write a note on the following in about 100 words each.
6. What is the meaning of social structure?
7. Define the concept of tribe.
8. Discuss briefly the impact of globalisation on family in India.
9. Define the concept of organic solidarity given by Émile Durkheim.
10. List the four types of economy based on the way scarce resources are distributed in society.
6. What is the meaning of social structure?
7. Define the concept of tribe.
8. Discuss briefly the impact of globalisation on family in India.
9. Define the concept of organic solidarity given by Émile Durkheim.
10. List the four types of economy based on the way scarce resources are distributed in society.
Expert Answer
Assignment A
Answer the following in about 500 words each.
Question:-1
Describe the nature and history of emergence of sociology in India.
Answer:
1. Introduction
Sociology, the systematic study of society, social institutions, and social relationships, has a rich history and diverse origins worldwide. In India, the emergence of sociology as an academic discipline is particularly intriguing due to the country’s complex social fabric, which includes a multitude of religions, languages, castes, and cultural practices. This paper aims to explore the nature and history of the emergence of sociology in India, focusing on its unique development in response to colonial rule, social reform movements, and the need to understand the rapidly changing Indian society.
2. Colonial Influence on the Emergence of Sociology in India
The formal emergence of sociology in India is closely linked to the British colonial period, which began in the mid-18th century and lasted until 1947. During this time, the British administration undertook extensive surveys and censuses to understand and control the diverse population. These efforts laid the groundwork for the development of sociology in India, as they necessitated a scientific study of Indian society and its various communities.
The colonial rulers were interested in understanding Indian society primarily to govern it more effectively. As a result, the early sociological studies were often carried out by British administrators and missionaries who documented Indian customs, social structures, and religious practices. This initial phase of sociology in India was heavily influenced by the colonial perspective, focusing on the exotic and ‘primitive’ aspects of Indian society as viewed from a Western lens.
3. The Role of Social Reform Movements
The rise of social reform movements in the 19th and early 20th centuries also played a significant role in the emergence of sociology in India. These movements were driven by the need to address various social issues such as caste discrimination, gender inequality, and religious orthodoxy. Reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Jyotirao Phule, and B.R. Ambedkar were keen observers of Indian society and used their writings and activism to highlight the need for social change.
The social reform movements fostered a critical consciousness among Indians, making them aware of the structural inequalities inherent in their society. This awareness laid the foundation for a sociological imagination, where social issues were understood not just as individual problems but as systemic issues that needed to be studied and addressed collectively. This shift in thinking was crucial for the development of sociology as a formal discipline in India, as it moved away from a purely descriptive approach to one that sought to understand and change society.
4. Establishment of Sociology as an Academic Discipline
The formal establishment of sociology as an academic discipline in India occurred in the early 20th century. The University of Bombay (now Mumbai) was the first to introduce sociology as a subject in 1919, followed by the University of Calcutta (now Kolkata) in 1921 and the University of Lucknow in 1924. These institutions played a pivotal role in developing sociology as a systematic and rigorous field of study in India.
The introduction of sociology in Indian universities was influenced by the broader global trends in the discipline, particularly the works of Western sociologists like Auguste Comte, Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. However, Indian sociologists were also keen to develop an indigenous sociology that would be relevant to the unique social realities of India. This led to the development of a distinct Indian sociology that combined Western theoretical frameworks with a deep understanding of India’s social, cultural, and historical context.
5. Contributions of Early Indian Sociologists
Early Indian sociologists like G.S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, D.P. Mukerji, and A.R. Desai made significant contributions to the development of sociology in India. They played a crucial role in establishing the discipline’s academic legitimacy and shaping its theoretical and methodological foundations.
-
G.S. Ghurye: Often referred to as the ‘father of Indian sociology,’ Ghurye was instrumental in introducing the study of caste, tribes, and kinship in Indian sociology. His work focused on understanding Indian society through the lens of cultural diversity and historical continuity.
-
M.N. Srinivas: Known for his pioneering work on caste and village studies, Srinivas developed the concept of ‘Sanskritization,’ which describes how lower castes in India adopt the customs and practices of higher castes to improve their social status. His emphasis on fieldwork and ethnography marked a significant departure from the earlier descriptive and theoretical approach to a more empirical and inductive study of Indian society.
-
D.P. Mukerji: Mukerji’s work was characterized by a critical engagement with Western sociological theories and a deep understanding of India’s social and cultural context. He emphasized the importance of understanding Indian society from within, advocating for an ‘indigenous sociology’ that would be relevant to India’s unique social realities.
-
A.R. Desai: A Marxist sociologist, Desai focused on the study of Indian society from a class perspective, highlighting the economic and political dimensions of social structures. His work on the Indian state and its role in maintaining class inequalities was groundbreaking and contributed to developing a critical sociology in India.
6. Post-Independence Development of Sociology in India
After India gained independence in 1947, the discipline of sociology continued to evolve, reflecting the changing social, political, and economic landscape of the country. The post-independence period saw a renewed interest in studying Indian society’s structural and cultural dimensions, focusing on issues such as industrialization, urbanization, social stratification, and development.
During this period, sociology in India became more diverse, incorporating various theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. The influence of Marxism, feminism, and postmodernism became more pronounced, leading to a more critical and reflexive sociology that questioned established norms and explored new areas of research. Indian sociologists also began to engage more with global debates, contributing to the development of sociology as a truly international discipline.
7. Contemporary Trends in Indian Sociology
Today, sociology in India is a vibrant and dynamic field that addresses a wide range of social issues. Contemporary Indian sociologists are increasingly focusing on topics such as globalization, migration, gender, environment, and digital society, reflecting the changing realities of Indian society in the 21st century.
The discipline has also become more interdisciplinary, with sociologists collaborating with scholars from anthropology, political science, economics, and cultural studies to develop a more holistic understanding of social phenomena. This has led to the emergence of new sub-fields such as urban sociology, medical sociology, and the sociology of science and technology, further expanding the scope and relevance of sociology in India.
Conclusion
The emergence of sociology in India is a fascinating story of adaptation and transformation, reflecting the country’s complex social, cultural, and historical context. From its colonial beginnings to its current status as a diverse and dynamic discipline, sociology in India has evolved to meet the changing needs of society. By combining Western theoretical frameworks with a deep understanding of Indian social realities, Indian sociologists have developed a distinct and rich tradition that continues to contribute to the global field of sociology.
Question:-2
Discuss the agrarian class structure in India with examples.
Answer:
1. Introduction
Agrarian class structure in India is a complex and multifaceted topic, shaped by historical, social, economic, and political factors. It refers to the hierarchical organization of rural society based on land ownership, production relations, and social status. The agrarian class structure has undergone significant transformations over the centuries, influenced by colonial rule, land reforms, green revolution, and liberalization. This paper aims to explore the various classes within the agrarian structure in India, their characteristics, and the dynamics that govern their interactions, with examples to illustrate these points.
2. Historical Background of Agrarian Class Structure in India
The agrarian class structure in India has deep historical roots that date back to ancient times. Traditionally, the rural economy was dominated by a feudal system where land was owned by a few powerful landlords, often belonging to higher castes, while the majority of the population worked as tenants or laborers on these lands. This system was characterized by a rigid hierarchy based on caste, which determined the roles and status of individuals in the rural society.
During the British colonial period, the agrarian class structure underwent significant changes with the introduction of new land revenue systems such as the Zamindari, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari systems. These systems consolidated the power of landlords and created new classes of intermediaries, leading to increased exploitation of peasants and agricultural laborers. The colonial policies also disrupted traditional agrarian relations and set the stage for the emergence of new classes and economic disparities in rural India.
3. Key Classes in the Agrarian Structure
The agrarian class structure in India can be broadly categorized into several distinct classes based on land ownership, control over resources, and roles in agricultural production. These classes include:
-
Landlords: Landlords, also known as Zamindars or Jagirdars, are the highest class in the agrarian hierarchy. They own large tracts of land and often lease them to tenants for cultivation. Landlords typically do not engage in direct agricultural labor but derive their income from land rents and other forms of extraction. They hold significant social and political power in rural areas due to their economic status and historical privileges.
-
Rich Peasants: Rich peasants, or kulaks, own substantial landholdings and have the means to invest in modern agricultural technologies and inputs. They engage in commercial farming and produce surplus crops for the market. Rich peasants often employ wage laborers and may lease out some of their land to sharecroppers. They occupy a middle position in the agrarian hierarchy and have a strong influence on local agricultural practices and policies.
-
Middle Peasants: Middle peasants own moderate-sized landholdings and primarily engage in subsistence farming. They may produce some surplus for the market but rely largely on family labor for cultivation. Middle peasants face challenges such as limited access to credit, irrigation, and modern inputs, which constrain their productivity and income. They represent a significant portion of the rural population and play a crucial role in sustaining the agrarian economy.
-
Small Peasants and Marginal Farmers: Small peasants and marginal farmers own very small plots of land, often less than two hectares, and struggle to make ends meet. They rely heavily on family labor and may also work as wage laborers on other farms to supplement their income. Due to their limited resources and vulnerability to market fluctuations, small peasants and marginal farmers are often trapped in cycles of poverty and indebtedness.
-
Landless Agricultural Laborers: Landless agricultural laborers form the lowest rung of the agrarian class structure. They do not own any land and depend entirely on wage labor for their livelihood. Agricultural laborers often work on a seasonal basis and are employed by landlords, rich peasants, or commercial farms. They face precarious working conditions, low wages, and lack of social security, making them one of the most marginalized and exploited groups in rural India.
4. Examples of Agrarian Class Dynamics in India
The agrarian class structure in India is marked by significant inequalities and power dynamics that shape the lives and livelihoods of rural communities. Here are a few examples that illustrate these dynamics:
-
Telangana Peasant Struggle: The Telangana Peasant Struggle (1946-1951) was a major agrarian movement in the erstwhile princely state of Hyderabad, where peasants rose against the oppressive landlords, or Jagirdars, who exploited them through exorbitant rents, forced labor, and violence. The movement, led by the Communist Party of India, mobilized thousands of landless laborers and small peasants, demanding land reforms, abolition of bonded labor, and fair wages. The struggle highlighted the deep-seated class conflicts in rural India and led to significant land reforms in the region.
-
Green Revolution and Agrarian Inequality: The Green Revolution, initiated in the 1960s, introduced high-yielding varieties of seeds, chemical fertilizers, and irrigation technologies to boost agricultural productivity in India. While the Green Revolution led to substantial increases in crop yields and food security, it also exacerbated agrarian inequalities. The benefits of the Green Revolution were largely concentrated among rich peasants and landlords who could afford the new technologies, while small peasants and landless laborers were left behind. This created a widening gap between the rich and poor in rural India and reinforced existing class hierarchies.
-
Naxalite Movement: The Naxalite movement, which began in the late 1960s in the Naxalbari village of West Bengal, is an armed insurgency that seeks to overthrow the existing socio-economic order and establish a communist state. The movement draws its support primarily from landless agricultural laborers, tribal communities, and other marginalized groups who face exploitation and oppression at the hands of landlords and state authorities. The Naxalite movement is a manifestation of the deep-rooted class conflicts and inequalities in the agrarian structure of India, reflecting the frustration and anger of the rural poor against the systemic injustices they face.
5. Impact of Land Reforms on Agrarian Class Structure
Land reforms have been a crucial instrument for restructuring the agrarian class system in India, aiming to reduce inequalities in land ownership and improve the socio-economic status of the rural poor. After independence, the Indian government introduced several land reform measures, including the abolition of Zamindari, tenancy reforms, and ceiling laws on landholdings.
While these reforms had some success in redistributing land and empowering the lower classes, their impact has been uneven and limited due to various factors such as bureaucratic inefficiencies, political resistance, and lack of effective implementation. In many cases, landlords were able to circumvent the laws through legal loopholes and retained control over their lands, while landless laborers and small peasants continued to face exploitation and insecurity.
6. Recent Changes and Contemporary Challenges
In recent decades, the agrarian class structure in India has been undergoing further changes due to factors such as globalization, market liberalization, and urbanization. These changes have led to new challenges and opportunities for different classes in rural society.
-
Decline of Small-Scale Farming: With the increasing commercialization of agriculture and integration into global markets, small-scale farming has become less viable for many small peasants and marginal farmers. They face rising costs of inputs, fluctuating market prices, and competition from large agribusinesses, leading to increased indebtedness and land dispossession. As a result, many small farmers are migrating to urban areas in search of alternative livelihoods, contributing to the growing phenomenon of rural-urban migration.
-
Emergence of New Classes: The liberalization of the Indian economy has also led to the emergence of new classes within the agrarian structure, such as contract farmers, agri-business entrepreneurs, and corporate landowners. These new actors have different interests and resources compared to traditional agrarian classes, leading to new forms of conflicts and alliances in rural areas. The entry of corporate entities into agriculture, for instance, has raised concerns about land grabbing, displacement of small farmers, and loss of traditional agricultural practices.
-
Increasing Rural Distress: Despite the changes in the agrarian class structure, rural distress remains a significant issue in India. Agrarian crises, marked by declining incomes, rising debts, and increasing suicides among farmers, reflect the deep-seated structural problems in the rural economy. The agrarian distress is not only an economic issue but also a social and political one, as it highlights the continued marginalization and exploitation of rural communities.
Conclusion
The agrarian class structure in India is a dynamic and evolving phenomenon, shaped by historical legacies, social hierarchies, economic policies, and political movements. While significant progress has been made in addressing some of the inequalities and injustices in the rural economy, many challenges persist, reflecting the complexities and contradictions of Indian society. Understanding the agrarian class structure and its dynamics is crucial for addressing the issues of rural poverty, inequality, and social justice in India.
Assignment B
Answer the following questions in about 250 words each.
Question:-3
Compare the administrative perspective with that of the Orientalist and the Indologists.
Answer:
Comparing the Administrative Perspective with that of the Orientalist and the Indologists
The administrative, Orientalist, and Indologist perspectives represent different approaches to studying Indian society, culture, and history, particularly during the colonial period. Each perspective had distinct motivations, methodologies, and impacts on understanding Indian civilization.
Administrative Perspective: The administrative perspective emerged primarily from British colonial officials who sought to understand Indian society to govern it effectively. This perspective was pragmatic and utilitarian, focusing on the practical aspects of administration, revenue collection, law, and order. British administrators like James Mill viewed Indian society through a lens of Western superiority and often portrayed it as static, backward, and in need of reform. Their writings emphasized the need for British intervention to civilize and modernize India. This approach was often dismissive of India’s cultural and historical complexities and aimed at justifying colonial rule.
Orientalist Perspective: In contrast, the Orientalist perspective was rooted in a fascination with the ancient and classical aspects of Indian culture. Orientalists were scholars who studied India’s languages, literature, religions, and philosophies with great enthusiasm and respect. Figures like William Jones and Max Müller sought to explore and document India’s rich heritage. They believed that understanding India’s past was crucial to comprehending its present. While Orientalists often romanticized India’s ancient culture, seeing it as exotic and spiritually profound, their work contributed significantly to the preservation and dissemination of Indian texts and knowledge. However, this perspective sometimes led to a static view of India, idealizing its past while ignoring contemporary realities.
Indologist Perspective: Indologists were scholars, both Western and Indian, who took a more academic and rigorous approach to studying Indian society. Unlike the Orientalists, who often focused on the religious and literary traditions, Indologists examined a broader range of sources, including archaeological, linguistic, and anthropological evidence. They aimed to construct a more comprehensive understanding of Indian history and culture. Indologists like D.D. Kosambi and R.C. Majumdar offered a critical analysis of India’s past, often challenging both the colonial and Orientalist narratives. They emphasized India’s dynamic history, social structures, and indigenous developments, providing a more balanced and nuanced perspective on Indian civilization.
In summary, while the administrative perspective was practical and often dismissive of Indian culture, the Orientalist perspective romanticized India’s past, and the Indologist approach sought a critical and comprehensive understanding of Indian society. Each perspective played a role in shaping Western and Indian views of India, with lasting impacts on the study of Indian history and culture.
Question:-4
Who are the subalterns? Discuss one of the subaltern movements in India.
Answer:
Who are the Subalterns? Discuss One of the Subaltern Movements in India
The term "subaltern" refers to marginalized groups in society that are systematically excluded from power, economic opportunities, and social status. Coined by Italian Marxist thinker Antonio Gramsci and popularized in the context of Indian history by the Subaltern Studies Group, "subaltern" is used to describe individuals and communities that lack access to hegemonic power structures. In India, subalterns include a wide range of groups such as lower castes (Dalits), Adivasis (tribal communities), peasants, women, and religious minorities, who have historically faced oppression, discrimination, and exclusion from mainstream society.
One significant subaltern movement in India is the Dalit movement, which advocates for the rights and dignity of Dalits, formerly known as "untouchables," who are placed at the lowest rung of the caste hierarchy. The Dalit movement has a long history, with its roots going back to the anti-caste struggles of the 19th and early 20th centuries. One of the most prominent leaders of this movement was Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, an influential social reformer, lawyer, and the principal architect of the Indian Constitution.
Ambedkar’s activism was pivotal in organizing Dalits against caste oppression and demanding equal rights and opportunities. He fought against untouchability and for the inclusion of social, economic, and educational rights for Dalits. His efforts led to the drafting of laws that outlawed untouchability and aimed to uplift marginalized communities through affirmative action.
A notable event in the Dalit movement is the Mahad Satyagraha of 1927. This protest was organized by Ambedkar to challenge the caste-based restrictions on the use of public water resources. Dalits, under his leadership, marched to the Chavdar Lake in Mahad, Maharashtra, and drank water from the lake, defying the upper caste-imposed ban. This act was symbolic of the Dalits’ demand for equality and dignity.
The Mahad Satyagraha was a significant moment in the Dalit movement, highlighting the quest for social justice and equality for subaltern communities. It underscored the importance of collective action and civil disobedience in challenging entrenched social hierarchies and achieving socio-political change in India.
Question:-5
Describe the features and types of industries in India.
Answer:
Describe the Features and Types of Industries in India
India’s industrial landscape is diverse and dynamic, encompassing a wide range of sectors that contribute significantly to the country’s economic development. The industrial sector in India can be broadly classified into three main types: primary, secondary, and tertiary industries. Each type has distinct features and plays a vital role in the overall economic framework of the nation.
1. Primary Industries:
Primary industries in India include sectors like agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing. These industries are involved in the extraction and production of raw materials, which serve as the foundation for other industries. Agriculture is the most prominent primary industry in India, employing a significant portion of the population and contributing to the country’s food security and export economy. Mining is another critical sector, providing essential minerals like coal, iron ore, and bauxite, which are crucial for energy production and manufacturing.
Primary industries in India include sectors like agriculture, mining, forestry, and fishing. These industries are involved in the extraction and production of raw materials, which serve as the foundation for other industries. Agriculture is the most prominent primary industry in India, employing a significant portion of the population and contributing to the country’s food security and export economy. Mining is another critical sector, providing essential minerals like coal, iron ore, and bauxite, which are crucial for energy production and manufacturing.
2. Secondary Industries:
Secondary industries involve the processing and manufacturing of raw materials into finished or semi-finished products. This sector includes a wide range of activities such as automobile manufacturing, textiles, chemicals, steel production, and consumer goods. The secondary sector is vital for value addition and industrialization, contributing significantly to India’s GDP and employment. The Indian government has actively promoted industrial growth through policies like the Make in India initiative, which aims to boost manufacturing and attract foreign investment.
Secondary industries involve the processing and manufacturing of raw materials into finished or semi-finished products. This sector includes a wide range of activities such as automobile manufacturing, textiles, chemicals, steel production, and consumer goods. The secondary sector is vital for value addition and industrialization, contributing significantly to India’s GDP and employment. The Indian government has actively promoted industrial growth through policies like the Make in India initiative, which aims to boost manufacturing and attract foreign investment.
3. Tertiary Industries:
Tertiary industries, also known as the service sector, provide various services that support the economy, including finance, healthcare, education, transportation, and information technology. The service sector has emerged as a major contributor to India’s economic growth, especially in the last few decades. The IT and software services industry, in particular, has positioned India as a global leader in outsourcing and technology services, generating substantial revenue and employment opportunities.
Tertiary industries, also known as the service sector, provide various services that support the economy, including finance, healthcare, education, transportation, and information technology. The service sector has emerged as a major contributor to India’s economic growth, especially in the last few decades. The IT and software services industry, in particular, has positioned India as a global leader in outsourcing and technology services, generating substantial revenue and employment opportunities.
Features of Indian Industries:
The industrial sector in India is characterized by its diversity and heterogeneity, ranging from small-scale cottage industries to large multinational corporations. The country has a mix of traditional industries, such as textiles and handicrafts, and modern sectors like IT and pharmaceuticals. India’s industrial growth is driven by factors like a large domestic market, a young and skilled workforce, and supportive government policies. However, challenges such as infrastructure bottlenecks, regulatory hurdles, and environmental concerns continue to affect the sector’s overall growth and sustainability.
The industrial sector in India is characterized by its diversity and heterogeneity, ranging from small-scale cottage industries to large multinational corporations. The country has a mix of traditional industries, such as textiles and handicrafts, and modern sectors like IT and pharmaceuticals. India’s industrial growth is driven by factors like a large domestic market, a young and skilled workforce, and supportive government policies. However, challenges such as infrastructure bottlenecks, regulatory hurdles, and environmental concerns continue to affect the sector’s overall growth and sustainability.
In summary, India’s industrial sector is multifaceted, encompassing primary, secondary, and tertiary industries, each contributing uniquely to the country’s economic development and providing a broad base for future growth and innovation.
Assignment C
Write a note on the following in about 100 words each.
Question:-6
What is the meaning of social structure?
Answer:
What is the Meaning of Social Structure?
Social structure refers to the organized pattern of social relationships and institutions that together form the foundation of society. It encompasses the various ways in which society is organized, including its norms, values, roles, hierarchies, and institutions. Social structure dictates how individuals and groups interact with each other, shaping behavior and relationships within a community.
Social structures are composed of recurring social patterns such as class systems, family units, religious organizations, educational institutions, and political entities. These structures influence individual actions and contribute to the stability and continuity of society by establishing expected behaviors and social roles. They also determine the distribution of resources, power, and opportunities among different social groups, often leading to social stratification. Understanding social structure is essential for analyzing social phenomena and addressing issues related to inequality, social change, and collective behavior.
Question:-7
Define the concept of tribe.
Answer:
Define the Concept of Tribe
A tribe is a social group that is typically characterized by shared ancestry, culture, language, and traditions. Tribes are often seen as smaller, relatively self-sufficient communities that are connected through kinship ties and communal living. Historically, tribes have maintained distinct social, economic, and political systems, often governing themselves through customs and traditions rather than formal state institutions.
In many societies, tribes have a deep connection to their ancestral lands, which are integral to their identity and way of life. Tribal societies often engage in subsistence farming, hunting, and gathering, and their social structures are usually organized around clans or lineages. In India, tribes are referred to as "Scheduled Tribes" and are recognized by the government for their unique cultural heritage and distinct socio-economic status. Understanding the concept of a tribe is crucial for acknowledging the diversity of human societies and addressing issues related to tribal rights and development.
Question:-8
Discuss briefly the impact of globalisation on family in India.
Answer:
Discuss Briefly the Impact of Globalization on Family in India
Globalization has significantly impacted family structures and dynamics in India. As India integrates more into the global economy, there has been a noticeable shift from traditional joint family systems to nuclear families, particularly in urban areas. Economic opportunities, increased mobility, and changing lifestyle aspirations have led to this trend, as individuals move away from their extended families for work and education.
Globalization has also influenced family values and gender roles. With exposure to global cultures and norms, there is a gradual shift towards more egalitarian views regarding marriage, parenting, and household responsibilities. However, this has also led to challenges, such as the erosion of traditional support systems and increased stress due to the dual pressures of work and family life.
Overall, globalization has brought both opportunities and challenges, leading to a transformation in how families are structured and how they function in contemporary India.
Question:-9
Define the concept of organic solidarity given by Émile Durkheim.
Answer:
Define the Concept of Organic Solidarity Given by Émile Durkheim
Organic solidarity is a concept developed by sociologist Émile Durkheim to describe the social cohesion found in complex, industrial societies. Unlike mechanical solidarity, which binds people together through shared beliefs, values, and traditions in simpler societies, organic solidarity arises from the interdependence of individuals in a highly specialized and differentiated society.
In a society characterized by organic solidarity, individuals perform specialized roles and tasks, creating a complex division of labor. This specialization necessitates cooperation and mutual dependence, as each person relies on others to fulfill different functions necessary for the society’s overall well-being. This interconnectedness fosters social cohesion, not through similarity but through complementary differences and the need for collaboration.
Durkheim’s concept of organic solidarity highlights how modern societies maintain social order and unity through the diversity of roles and the intricate web of social and economic relationships that bind people together.
Question:-10
List the four types of economy based on the way scarce resources are distributed in society.
Answer:
List the Four Types of Economy Based on the Way Scarce Resources Are Distributed in Society
Economies can be categorized based on how scarce resources are allocated and distributed among people in society. The four main types are:
-
Traditional Economy: Resources are allocated based on customs, traditions, and cultural beliefs. Economic roles and activities are typically passed down through generations, focusing on subsistence farming, hunting, and gathering.
-
Command Economy: The government or central authority controls the allocation of resources and production decisions. This type is characterized by state ownership of resources, as seen in planned economies like the former Soviet Union.
-
Market Economy: Resource distribution is determined by the free market, guided by supply and demand principles. Private individuals and businesses make production and consumption decisions, with minimal government intervention.
-
Mixed Economy: Combines elements of both market and command economies. It allows for private enterprise and market-driven resource allocation while the government intervenes in certain sectors to correct market failures and ensure social welfare.
